mhb
40 Cal.
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2011
- Messages
- 516
- Reaction score
- 256
Over the years, I've had several rifle-muskets, but never one which I thought shot well enough to keep, until recently.
The latest candidate is an early Navy Arms Model 1863 Type 2, made by Miroku, apparently.
It actually shoots quite well, and has an excellent trigger, but...
It suffers from a problem which has always made the rifle-muskets a PITA (to me, anyway) to actually shoot to their potential: lousy sights. The rear sight has a tiny V-shaped battle sight notch located in the bottom of a semi-circular cut in the sight blade, while the front sight is tiny, shiny, too short, rounded in every direction, and, together with the rear sight, makes a combination of sights that is almost imaginary. In addition, the sights are installed so as to give a POI about 6" high and left at 50 yards. The rear sight does, of course, have a taller turn-up blade with an aperture in the middle and another notch at its top, but, with the current front sight, and the alignment problem, those would only be useful for shooting at cavalry passing from right-to-left, or, possibly, aircraft. The rifle will group very well at 50 yards, though, which is pretty amazing to me considering what the actual sight picture looks like.
So, knowing that the serious rifle-musket shooters (NSSA) are permitted to make some changes to the sights, I need to know how much latitude is actually permitted. I have a replacement rear sight blade, which I can fit and zero, but I'd also like to do something about the front sight, such as installing a taller, sharper-contoured blade that I can actually see the same way twice.
Any guidance would be appreciated. I've actually visited the NSSA web site and read their rules, but can't actually determine how much latitude is permitted in sight modification.
Then, too, if anyone has a source for better sights I won't actually have to make myself, that would be good...
Thanks for any help!
mhb - Mike
The latest candidate is an early Navy Arms Model 1863 Type 2, made by Miroku, apparently.
It actually shoots quite well, and has an excellent trigger, but...
It suffers from a problem which has always made the rifle-muskets a PITA (to me, anyway) to actually shoot to their potential: lousy sights. The rear sight has a tiny V-shaped battle sight notch located in the bottom of a semi-circular cut in the sight blade, while the front sight is tiny, shiny, too short, rounded in every direction, and, together with the rear sight, makes a combination of sights that is almost imaginary. In addition, the sights are installed so as to give a POI about 6" high and left at 50 yards. The rear sight does, of course, have a taller turn-up blade with an aperture in the middle and another notch at its top, but, with the current front sight, and the alignment problem, those would only be useful for shooting at cavalry passing from right-to-left, or, possibly, aircraft. The rifle will group very well at 50 yards, though, which is pretty amazing to me considering what the actual sight picture looks like.
So, knowing that the serious rifle-musket shooters (NSSA) are permitted to make some changes to the sights, I need to know how much latitude is actually permitted. I have a replacement rear sight blade, which I can fit and zero, but I'd also like to do something about the front sight, such as installing a taller, sharper-contoured blade that I can actually see the same way twice.
Any guidance would be appreciated. I've actually visited the NSSA web site and read their rules, but can't actually determine how much latitude is permitted in sight modification.
Then, too, if anyone has a source for better sights I won't actually have to make myself, that would be good...
Thanks for any help!
mhb - Mike