The arms and armor exhibit in the Philadelphia museum of art was closed for renovations, but the museum of the American Revolution had some interesting rifles on display and was overall a great museum.
Rifles at the Museum of the American Revolution
- Thread starter TobJohn
- Start date
Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:
Nice.
Did they put someone’s actual headstone in there?
Did they put someone’s actual headstone in there?
It looks they did lol
They did a good job of mixing artifacts and information, which museums are struggling to balance right now.
They had a big display of militia Fowlers and military muskets, which was also very cool
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
- Messages
- 46
- Reaction score
- 71
Wow, an actual Ferguson and a 1776 Pattern Infantry rifle.
I did a double take when I passed them. “Those are some weird muskets… wait wow!!!”
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2005
- Messages
- 5,284
- Reaction score
- 11,269
Hi,
They have a good interactive computer display for many of the arms. That is not an ordnance issued Ferguson. It is a privately made and purchased rifle.
dave
They have a good interactive computer display for many of the arms. That is not an ordnance issued Ferguson. It is a privately made and purchased rifle.
dave
Captain Michael Cresap of a Maryland Rifle Coy. He died of an illness in New York City marching on his was to the siege of Boston.
He was a friend and distant relative of one of my Patriot ancestors, Capt. Andrew Lynn, Jr., who was then living in Westmoreland County, Pa.
I wondered about that Ferguson when I saw the picture. I have heard the only two military model Fergusons are at Monmouth and the other in a library either in Detroit or Minnesota. I also heard that Narragansett was able to disassemble the one in the library to make wax castings when they built their copy in the late '90s early 2000s. Don't know if that is correct or not. It seems I heard or read somewhere once that the Fergusons at those locations were carried up north by Union troops returning home after the war. The theory was some of Ferguson's riflemen kept their rifles when Ferguson's unit was broken up and carried them back to their regiments , where they were apparently captured in the Southern theater. I believe the Ferguson at King's Mountain is a sporting model.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2005
- Messages
- 5,284
- Reaction score
- 11,269
Hi Flint1,
TRS did make copies of the Ordnance issued Ferguson in the Milwaukee Public Museum. The only other known survivng Ordnance Ferguson is in the Morristown National Historical Park in New Jersey. I've built 3 Ferguson rifles using TRS parts and the castings are generally excellent.
Mine are copies of the Morristown gun, which I handled and examined closely. There are lots of stories and myths about the Ferguson rifles. I've never seen any documentation that the survivng rifles came up from the south. Moreover, if some of Ferguson's men kept their rifles it was in direct violation of Howe's orders. There are those who want to believe Ferguson rifles were used at King's Mountain? The only British soldier at King's Mountain was Ferguson and he did not have a rifle on him when he died. The rifles were originally issued to British soldiers so to have been at King's Mountain, they had to be reissued to loyalists. There is no surviving documentation of that but it is clear Ferguson's Amercian Volunteers were armed at Charleston with the usual period arms and perhaps some pattern 1776 muzzleloading rifles.
dave
TRS did make copies of the Ordnance issued Ferguson in the Milwaukee Public Museum. The only other known survivng Ordnance Ferguson is in the Morristown National Historical Park in New Jersey. I've built 3 Ferguson rifles using TRS parts and the castings are generally excellent.
Mine are copies of the Morristown gun, which I handled and examined closely. There are lots of stories and myths about the Ferguson rifles. I've never seen any documentation that the survivng rifles came up from the south. Moreover, if some of Ferguson's men kept their rifles it was in direct violation of Howe's orders. There are those who want to believe Ferguson rifles were used at King's Mountain? The only British soldier at King's Mountain was Ferguson and he did not have a rifle on him when he died. The rifles were originally issued to British soldiers so to have been at King's Mountain, they had to be reissued to loyalists. There is no surviving documentation of that but it is clear Ferguson's Amercian Volunteers were armed at Charleston with the usual period arms and perhaps some pattern 1776 muzzleloading rifles.
dave
very interesting, thanks for sharing
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2020
- Messages
- 763
- Reaction score
- 840
Excellent post!!
Thanks for that info Dave! I was completely off on the state where the Ferguson is in the public museum (as well as the type of building) but I was in the correct state for the other. Since you said that I do remember now it was Morristown I heard. And you are correct, I have heard there were no rifles used at King's Mountain on the British (Tory) side and Ferguson was the only regular army soldier present on either side. I guess the NPS placed the Ferguson on display there since Ferguson was the commander there and the rifle is associated with his name. Back in the early '90s I read an article in Man at Arms how the Ferguson at King's Mountain was somehow stolen in 1966 and 25 years later the thief tried to sell it and made the mistake of contacting an antique gun dealer who remembered the theft and notified the police. Thanks again for your clarification and the great info. That is a beautiful rifle you made!
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
- Messages
- 46
- Reaction score
- 71
The Ferguson gets all the attention, but the Pattern 1776 is the more important gun. It is the grandaddy of the Baker rifle. Its introduction probably convinced many an upcoming British infantry officer of the utility of rifle armed light troops. The Ferguson was too delicate and expensive to be a practical military rifle. The stock was too thin around the breech to survive bayonet fighting. Some German Jagers were armed with rifles that had bayonet lugs and bayonet exactly like the Baker wound up with in 1800. Military muskets and rifles have double as clubs.
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Messages
- 3,706
- Reaction score
- 4,718
What's too say? Ungrateful pack of revolting rebels & turn coats, ill led by rogue's like that disgusting Franklin. Where it not for British aid at great cost the French would have pushed you all into the Sea or you'd be speaking French. Benedict Arnold saw through this deception & you call him a Traitor. Of course it bankrupted France which led to the French Revolution so some small benefit. But it led to that upstart Corsican Bonaparte who was the thief of Europe and left us thin spread to recover your revolting Colonists' plundering . Ferguson had the chance to shoot that turncoat Washington. But being a gentleman he declined as he deemed it unsporting . 'Not cricket' you understand . I do get effectively Fan Mail, but I don't expect much. My wife's American. She trots out all this poop you all get at School. We Brits are the villains; your lot the heroes .
Rudyard
Rudyard
Right or wrong, rebelling against monarchy is always the cool decision
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2019
- Messages
- 3,706
- Reaction score
- 4,718
My dear Tobjohn Whats Cool about it? Politicians come & go, jumped up money men mostly. A monarch serves as a check & balance . They rein but don't rule. I 'me quite OK with that I was born a Georgian, lived my life as an Elizabethan & its a toss up whether I'le die as a Charles, I generally carve the date & Monarchs cipher under the tool box lids or under the barrel if I date it at all .I expected a flood of vitriolic hatred but Loyalist Dave's fair comment was all I got plus your curious post .
Regards Rudyard
Monarchy is a government of spoiled inbreds that inherited everything. Nowadays, monarchs may not have real power, but they are a bunch of trust fund kids living off the government.
Regular politicians may be scummy, but getting to (theoretically) choose them is inherently more just.
While my own personal views are as anti monarchist (and inherited nobility in general) as they can get, and much more radical about it than I want to post here, my original comment was a joke because war is never cool and it’s playing on the American anti monarchy mindset
Similar threads
