I guess I don't understand that kind of attitude by Conservation officers. Their job is not to harrass the law abiding, but to enforce the game codes and laws against violators. Here in Central Illinois, we find pheasants living in both corn field stubble, soy bean fields, and in edge cover, next to barrow pits, ponds, and lakes. Its pretty obvious to any observer by the way we are hunting that we are hunting upland game rather than jumping ducks, or geese. I am a lawyer, and a hunter safety instructor, and I have had more than one stern conversation with a few officers over my past 24 years teaching about what they say to my students. I also have talked to State's Attorneys about COs filing bogus charges and harrassing hunters. Generally, poop still runs down hill. You can be arrested for anything but are a long way from being convicted of an offense. When a prosecutor or Judge finds out a CO is making bogus arrests, he gets taken to the woodshed personally. If it continues, his boss is given a phone call, and warnings are made by a prosecutor that if the guy doesn't clean up his act, the prosecutor will dismiss all his tickets, good or bad. Then his boss takes him to HIS woodshed.
As an attorney, I can tell you it is a safisfying experience to begin that process for an officer so deserving! No one wins when Police act so poorly that they generate a general disrespect of the law. And, other law enforcement officers, from all departments, treat the guy like a pariah. Some of these guys last an amazingly long time, and others leave the job to find something else to do. We had a local cop issuing tickets for drunk driving, and lying about how the drivers were operating their cars. The review of the camera from his own car proved he was lying. He had 4 cases dismissed in one day, by a judge. He stayed on the job, but no one knows how. He was not given much respect by prosecutors after that. He was finally removed from traffic enforcement, and that seemed to take the wind out of his sails.
If you are hunting upland game, you are wearing blaze orange, usually hunting with others, have a breed of dog that is either a pointer, or retriever, or both, and are carrying shells loaded with smaller birdshot intended for killing rabbits and pheasants. As in #7 1/2, $6, #5, and maybe #4.
While #4 lead shot used to be used for hunting ducks in some situations, it was more common to see hunters use #2, or #1 shot. Waterfowl hunters do not wear blaze orange. They don't usually walk fields, or edge cover with a dog, trying to flush something. They usually hunt from a blind, and call the ducks or geese to them. If I were a Conseravtion Police officers, I would be far more interested in finding a duck or goose call in the pocket or around the neck of my hunters, than the fact that they are hunting next to a ditch, stream, river, or body of water. In Illinois, you have to wear at least a blaze orange hat when hunting upland game. No such requirement is made of waterfowl hunters. If you are hunting pheasants and you don't have a blaze orange hat on, that is the ticket I would write for you, not hunting waterfowl! ( I have taught officers how to investigate crime scenes, and what constitutes probable cause as a lecturer in the past. I am not opposed to good police work, or good officers. In fact, it was my acquaintance with so many such men and women that has really soured me on the few bad actors out there. The good officers don't know how to either get the bad ones to change, or get rid of them. More than anything else, bad cops make their jobs hard to do.)