ohio ramrod said:
The snail type is considered by many to be stronger since there is more metal to support the nipple and absorb the impact of the Hammer. The drum type has only the threaded part going into the barrel to support it. :idunno:
Not if the gunbuilder made the gun right.
The bottom of a properly installed side mounted drum is resting directly on the lockplate. It is not just screwed into the side of the barrel.
If the side mounted drum is resting directly on the lockplate, there is no stress caused to the threads when the hammer hits the cap on the nipple.
As for the supposed superiority of the snail style breech because of the angled path of the fire channel, I would disagree.
The flame from the nipple must make a right angle turn as soon as it leaves the bottom of the nipple with both the side drum design and the snail design.
After making that 90 degree turn, the flame from a side mounted drum only has to travel about 3/8 of an inch before it finds itself in the main powder charge.
After making that 90 degree turn, the flame in a snail style breech plug must travel at least 1/2 inch and with many, closer to 3/4 of an inch thru the small (often less than 1/8 inch in diameter) flame channel hole.
IMO, this distance is important because the flame looses a lot of its heat to the walls of the hole as it passes thru it.
Speaking of the flame channel hole, because the side mounted drum is only about 3/8 long, the powder in the main charge doesn't have far to go before it finds itself at the bottom of the nipple. It's almost there just by pouring the powder down the barrel.
With the snail (patent) breeches, making its way thru that (often) 3/4 inch long flame channel to the bottom of the nipple can be a problem.
If the flame channel has any fouling buildup or any oil, left from the last time the barrel was cleaned, it can form a dam that prevents any powder at all from ending up right below the nipple when the gun is loaded.
I much prefer the lock supported side drum to the snail style breeches.