adiochiro3
32 Cal.
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2012
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 0
So I've been to the range a couple of times since my first post, and am getting better results. Today started out promising; I am shooting .530 Hornady RB and -- on the advice of some here on MLF -- I upped my patch thickness from .010 to .015 and the results were:
[/img]
This is the group I'm hoping to eventually end up with at 100 yards. I moved the target in to 25 yards and used 80 grains 777 (I plan to hunt) with .020 (two .010) patches. The RB's were not too difficult to ram home. Here's the result:
[/img]
I was pleased, and moved the target back out to 50 yards with the same load and the group spread way more than I expected.
[/img]
I had my buddy -- who is an excellent shot -- spit a couple down range, and the spread was about the same as mine, so it appears to be either the load or the sight system (or both). I really don't like the rear sight on this gun, and I plan on changing it out or modifying it.
Should I try .535 RB's or up the patch thickness to .025? Other thoughts? Is there enough variation in the weight of the RB's to make a difference and produce "flyers?"
This is the group I'm hoping to eventually end up with at 100 yards. I moved the target in to 25 yards and used 80 grains 777 (I plan to hunt) with .020 (two .010) patches. The RB's were not too difficult to ram home. Here's the result:
I was pleased, and moved the target back out to 50 yards with the same load and the group spread way more than I expected.
I had my buddy -- who is an excellent shot -- spit a couple down range, and the spread was about the same as mine, so it appears to be either the load or the sight system (or both). I really don't like the rear sight on this gun, and I plan on changing it out or modifying it.
Should I try .535 RB's or up the patch thickness to .025? Other thoughts? Is there enough variation in the weight of the RB's to make a difference and produce "flyers?"