WV_Hillbilly
45 Cal.
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2005
- Messages
- 707
- Reaction score
- 3
Well, I did finally make it online again. Dial-up is pretty slow and not very reliable around here. Dinner was good, though not the best batch I've ever fried.
I received a reply from Traditions Muzzleloading, regarding discontinuation of sidelock guns and pistols. At least for now, we can breathe a "sigh of relief"... to paraphrase, "Traditions has no intention to discontinue production and sale of sidelock guns, pistols, and cap-n-ball revolvers."
I think CVA is "shooting their own foot", or "poo-ing in their own mess kit", whichever saying you prefer. It was those inexpensive (i.e. CHEAP!) muzzleloaders with which "most" of us became introduced to muzzleloading. (about 30yrs ago for me) I think the most recent Mt. Stalker I got from Bass-Pro was $49.99 plus $10 shipping. That price even beat Wal-Mart's CVA "Bobcat" by $10 too. These guns were great for a beginner or for a "loaner rifle". Traded that one off with some other material just a few months ago. Now I wish I had a truckload of them (Mt. Stalkers that is, or Bobcats).
I have long since "graduated" to better quality muzzleloaders; but cost vs. performance in a CVA is not too shabby at all. Same goes for the Traditions guns, which I roughly consider as equals to CVA in quality.
I can't honestly comment on whether the CVA inlines are "safe" or "magnum capable". I have heard that some of the early CVA inlines didn't hold up too well. I proof test all the muzzleloading guns that I intend to shoot. I won't give the charge weight or projectile info for the loads. Wouldn't want someone to think I am recommending that kind of thing as a regular practice. Of course, if I ever did want to shoot pelletized black powder substitutes and saboted & jacketed pistol bullets with 209 shotgun primers... you can bet I'd be doing some pretty severe overloads and proofs tests before I deemed it to be user friendly. 'Nuff said about that... the thoughts of having only inlines to shoot is making me queazy.
Anyhow, here's the score for inexpensive sidelock guns. Traditions - 1 CVA - 0
Shoot safely!
WV_Hillbilly
I received a reply from Traditions Muzzleloading, regarding discontinuation of sidelock guns and pistols. At least for now, we can breathe a "sigh of relief"... to paraphrase, "Traditions has no intention to discontinue production and sale of sidelock guns, pistols, and cap-n-ball revolvers."
I think CVA is "shooting their own foot", or "poo-ing in their own mess kit", whichever saying you prefer. It was those inexpensive (i.e. CHEAP!) muzzleloaders with which "most" of us became introduced to muzzleloading. (about 30yrs ago for me) I think the most recent Mt. Stalker I got from Bass-Pro was $49.99 plus $10 shipping. That price even beat Wal-Mart's CVA "Bobcat" by $10 too. These guns were great for a beginner or for a "loaner rifle". Traded that one off with some other material just a few months ago. Now I wish I had a truckload of them (Mt. Stalkers that is, or Bobcats).
I have long since "graduated" to better quality muzzleloaders; but cost vs. performance in a CVA is not too shabby at all. Same goes for the Traditions guns, which I roughly consider as equals to CVA in quality.
I can't honestly comment on whether the CVA inlines are "safe" or "magnum capable". I have heard that some of the early CVA inlines didn't hold up too well. I proof test all the muzzleloading guns that I intend to shoot. I won't give the charge weight or projectile info for the loads. Wouldn't want someone to think I am recommending that kind of thing as a regular practice. Of course, if I ever did want to shoot pelletized black powder substitutes and saboted & jacketed pistol bullets with 209 shotgun primers... you can bet I'd be doing some pretty severe overloads and proofs tests before I deemed it to be user friendly. 'Nuff said about that... the thoughts of having only inlines to shoot is making me queazy.
Anyhow, here's the score for inexpensive sidelock guns. Traditions - 1 CVA - 0
Shoot safely!
WV_Hillbilly