• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

The Swiss Pauly Gun & Myths

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Loyalist Dave

Cannon
Staff member
Moderator
MLF Supporter
Joined
Nov 22, 2011
Messages
17,012
Reaction score
15,934
Location
People's Republic of Maryland
There is a myth floating around that Jean Samuel Pauly invented an "inline" ignition for a gun in 1808. What he and a French fellow named François Prélat developed, was an early, black powder breech loading rifle. This was later developed into the needle gun, which is a bolt action design, slightly cosmetically similar to many of the modern muzzleloaders, but NOT a muzzleloader.

Part of the modern myth may stem from the use in 1836 of a papier mache "sabot" used with bullets in Pauly/Dreyse cartridges, fired through Dreyse needle guns used by the Prussians.

Some folks seem to confuse the working of the action as the criteria for the naming of the modern muzzleloading rifles sold today, when it's the line formed from the external cap, to the main charge, to the muzzle that is the origin of the name.

There is a Spanish made SxS in existence, as well as a single shot gun in the Tower of London (made by a Bohemian fellow), that use an actual inline, flintlock ignition. They are ingenious, but if you like your eyebrows..., not very practical. The flint is driven forward like the edge of a coal shovel against the frizzen, which is closed as part of a sort of hatch, and when closed over the priming powder it is flush with the top surface of the barrel, as part of the breech of the barrel. So the flint strikes the fizzen, forcing it upwards and open and causing a spark to hit the prime, and boom. Probably an attempt at weather proofing the flintlock..., with the only problem being the frizzen opens toward the shooter's face as is the touch hole, and the frizzen also blocks the sights....
Here is an earlier thread on the rifle The Paczelt gun c. 1738


Folks also point to the Hall 1819 Rifle..., but that's a breech loader.

Modern muzzleloading rifles aren't flintlocks.... Any more than single shot, breech loading rifles are muzzleloaders, or are "primitive"..., even though one state considers them so...

Regardless of the materials used to build the rifle..., for a modern muzzleloading rifle to claim it is an actual decendant of a previously used ignition system..., I'd like to see an example of a caplock rifle, where there is a straight line from the cap, through the nipple mounted in the breech plug, to the main charge with the projectile, through the barrel and out the muzzle.

Is that too much to ask? :v:


:stir: :dead:

LD
 
Nmlra419.jpg

nmlra091.jpg

nmlra100.jpg



not a rifle, but..............


:stir: :haha:
 
For some reason the Hall is confused with an inline however it is not. In both the flint and percussion models the pan or nipple are located above the bore with a passage leading down to it. They are not inline with the bore, consider a traditional muzzleloader barrel simply turned 90 degrees so that the vent/nipple is at the top rather than on the side. The lockwork is behind the breech as in a boxlock action most commonly found on pistols. I may be way off base but I consider an inline as one in which the ignition source enters the barrel from the rear more or less axially aligned with the bore and the action to be located behind the breech. The Confederate Read & Watson (J. B. Barrett) rifles and carbines which were made using re-breached captured Hall barrels as well as the shotgun above are excellent examples.
 
Loyalist Dave said:
I'd like to see an example of a caplock rifle, where there is a straight line from the cap, through the nipple mounted in the breech plug, to the main charge with the projectile, through the barrel and out the muzzle.

Is that too much to ask?

Nope
babcockpl.jpg


This was on GB 2 or 3 years ago. I forget the details but IIRC it was dated to the 1840's.
 
:hmm: Works like an underhammer, mainspring is the trigger guard. I guess this one would be called an.....ready for it....afterhammer!!! :grin:

It really is brilliant. Wonder what it went for. Enjoy, J.D.
 
Don't have a photo handy (in the computer), but the J.B. Barrett rifle has a center hung hammer striking a nipple in the breechplug. Admittedly, the Barrett was a conversion of the breechloading Hall into a muzzleloader, but it was completely redesigned in the breech area and was strictly a muzzleloader.
 
I have a Wurfflein in line made in Philadelphia in the 1860's. It has DSTs' a box lock central hammer and a firing rod that slides forward to strike a cap on a nipple that is centrally in line with the bore. The cap is placed on the nipple through a recess on the underside of the barrel I'll post photos when I have a chance.
 
Hi All !!!

I have, what I thought was an inline Flobert (4mm) Cap-Lock Boy's Rifle.. I say Flobert as it has the Stock, Iron & Action of one...
I have never heard of any information on it so you can see this is of interest to me.. It is complete and has a ram-rod that enter's on the front left side of the Fore-stock..
I will post picture's this week !!!

Ed...
 
No problem Dave !!!

Pulled it out today and remembered that I tore it down (about 30yr's ago)... Looked at the Bore, it was smooth... Could be a Garden or Parlor Gun, fired by "Cap" only !!! Nice Patina, I think I'll put it back together......
 
About twenty five years ago, Muzzle Blasts carried a picture of a peculiar inline. It had a striker-plunger in the skeleton butt stock. The plunger was pulled back and trigger pull allowed the plunger to slide forward to strike a cap on a nipple which was through the breech and inline with the bore. A rather crude affair, home gun smith type stuff, but as I recall, believed to be from about the 1860's.

And on another note. The original 1830's needle gun designer , got the idea for the horizontal sliding striker from somewhere. I figure it was probably borrowed from another earlier gun design.
 
Hi Guy !!!

Mine has what I can only describe is as a "Rolling Block" action that housed the Firing Pin and close's over the inline Cap.. The Hammer provided the lock-up just like the later Cartridge style does.. I always thought it was an early eighteen hundred's model ... This due to the Patina, Cap-lock and heavy flat checkering... It is very old..

BTW; When I first got it, I discussed it at length with Turner Kirkland (Founder, Dixie Gun Works) and he insisted it could not be a Flobert as it was not a Cartridge Gun... SIGH...

Ed...
 
Back
Top