Thoughts on my 1840s rifle

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Drg

32 Cal
Joined
Jan 9, 2022
Messages
10
Reaction score
12
I joined here after following this forum a while. I own an 1840s percussion rifle that i am wondering if it is of value worthy of sending to an auction house. The rifle has been off and on kept in useable condition. It has R.Holmes on both the barrel and the lock. The gun is described in a 1951 book,i can't recall the name of. The stock has several repairs and the barrel has (Remington cast steel) on the bottom side,it is half octagon and half round and very heavy.. I have shot the gun recently with patched balls around 40 caliber. The hammer screw is incorrect. I bought it years ago and was told that it was made in NY around 1840. Everything i have learned has led me to believe that this is correct. It obviously well used but shots well and looks presentable. It is the oldest gun i own. Any thoughts or information is appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • 16417083006022617776979305875541.jpg
    16417083006022617776979305875541.jpg
    188.1 KB
  • 16417083931756837613514495744411.jpg
    16417083931756837613514495744411.jpg
    136.8 KB
  • 16417084387514087328825749374014.jpg
    16417084387514087328825749374014.jpg
    85.2 KB
  • 16417084555714102142678263331807.jpg
    16417084555714102142678263331807.jpg
    122 KB
  • 16417084753626516379510425034770.jpg
    16417084753626516379510425034770.jpg
    62.5 KB
  • 16417084977923424081260238869739.jpg
    16417084977923424081260238869739.jpg
    111.7 KB
I dont know why he couldnt shoot it. Its a nice looking piece and looks like real good condition for its age. Some pictures of the lock and snail area would be nice.
 
I would keep it and shoot it as long as the breech plug and drum and nipple are safe and solid. The gun has only a modest value because of the repairs and style. The Remington steel barrel should be good.
 
I would assume the owner inspected it or had it looked at by someone qualified, before shooting. I sure wouldnt fear a barrel simply because its 200 years old, if there were no indications of issues.
 
I would keep it and shoot it as long as the breech plug and drum and nipple are safe and solid. The gun has only a modest value because of the repairs and style. The Remington steel barrel should be good.
I suspected that it wasn't worth much. I am considering restocking it,but if it had any historical value I didn't want to ruin it.
 
Nothing wrong with a gun 200 years old if it is still solid, I look for old guns and will go too them before a newer one.
I have two guns built in the 1840's that were my Great Great Great Grandfathers. I shoot them often, and it gives me a sense of nostalgia to know that these guns have been in my family for over 200 years and are still being used.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0366.JPG
    IMG_0366.JPG
    121.2 KB
  • IMG_0362.JPG
    IMG_0362.JPG
    140.1 KB
I have two guns built in the 1840's that were my Great Great Great Grandfathers. I shoot them often, and it gives me a sense of nostalgia to know that these guns have been in my family for over 200 years and are still being used.
They look great!
 
I started with a cap only then worked my way up.
Smart! If there were obvious signs of metal failure it might have been a good idea to have it checked by a competent gunsmith. An acquaintance of mine bought a “barn gun”from a widow lady back in the late ‘60’s and was smart enough to brace it in a tire and touch it off via string pull… good thing as it ruptured and became junk in a fiery bang. Lesson learned! Gun did not look that bad come to think of it…
 
I've shot my 1790s Brown Bess that I rebuilt from a Nepal gun I purchased from IMA. Granted the first shot I had it sitting in a tire and pulled the trigger with a string...
 
Well its worth more then maybe you believe !! looks like a great rifle !!
I love that this gun is specifically described in an early book about American gun makers. The barrel marking is correct for the 1840 time period as well.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20220110_090348031_HDR.jpg
    IMG_20220110_090348031_HDR.jpg
    113.7 KB
I love that this gun is specifically described in an early book about American gun makers. The barrel marking is correct for the 1840 time period as well.
In another book the author mentions actually viewing the rifle in person around 1951.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220110-092559.png
    Screenshot_20220110-092559.png
    158.3 KB
Web search is pretty cool too.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220110-093046.png
    Screenshot_20220110-093046.png
    179.9 KB
Back
Top