Would there be a benefit to having the touch hole further forward? My rudimentary understanding is a touch hole further forward would burn the powder more completely and less energy would be wasted pushing un burnt powder down the barrel.
That is the 62-cal Tannenberg bronze hand gonne from Track of the Wolf, $195. But they don't list it anymore ... they must have lost their foundry source.What calibre is that one Flint?
If that were indeed the case ... THs on other fire locks would be far more forward than they are, and they are not. I also don't get the part about 'less energy wasted' ...My rudimentary understanding is a touch hole further forward would burn the powder more completely and less energy would be wasted pushing un burnt powder down the barrel.
If you burn back to front, doesn’t the powder igniting at the back, start pushing all the unburnt powder forward, so there is more recoil and a higher probability of powder remaining unburnt?If that were indeed the case ... THs on other fire locks would be far more forward than they are, and they are not. I also don't get the part about 'less energy wasted' ...
Yeah good point, and the whole “equal and opposite reaction” part of physics lol.I state 'BS' on that ... as likely the inventor of the Dreyse only wrote it that way for patent protection, LOL!
And whether the charge ignites at the back or a bit more forward, if already fired ... both conditions have unburnt powdah in the barrel, duh ...
May You share more photos of your handgonne?See? Simple c’sink @ touch hole. My hackbutt is the same, here’s the Tannenberg hand gonne.
View attachment 278379
Enter your email address to join: