Naphtali said:
So we are not talking about the cheap scissors molds that Dixie sells? Rather, I might see some at auction on eBay that appear to be both old and crude?
Either way, why would not a modern malleable iron affixed to a modern handle set design be carried in a bag? Or is merely carrying it that way negated by its being modern?
First of all, the cheap scissors molds by Dixie were/are pretty poor quality. Dixie first had them made when no one else was making RB molds in different sizes. Nowadays we have a far greater selection of mold sizes available and even good custom molds such as those made by Jeff Tanner in the UK.
Surprisingly, some of the crude looking, original antique molds will cast a good ball, though often we find them in sizes we don't use much nowadays. Probably part of the reason those molds are still around, as they have not seen a lot of continuous use. Though the halves of the molds have to line up well and the machining of the halves has to be good to cast a good ball, the outside of the mold is not important other than for esthetics.
Yes, one could use a modern made and modern design small mold to cast balls, that would fit in a shooting bag. However, most people don't feel a need or want to do that. They prefer to carry enough well cast balls to use for that day's hunting or shooting. Those balls may be carried loose in the bottom of a small "day" pouch or in some kind of small ball bag in the shooting pouch. This negates a need for carrying a mold in one's shooting pouch.
Most of the surviving original 18th century shooting pouches are so small that the original owners almost certainly did not carry a "bag mold" in the pouch. At least to me, they appear to be "Day Pouches" where only the bare necessities to shoot and operate the gun was carried in them. Personally, I think some 18th century frontiersmen who hunted far from civilization - had larger shooting pouches with bag molds and other things in them not normally found in the small surviving pouches. However, that is the subject of another thread or discussion.
Surviving early to mid 19th century pouches are often larger and some have been found with more "stuff" in them that are not needed to shoot a gun. Such things may include fishing hooks and line, or a compass, or various other things that today we might call "survival items." As I recall, a least one or two of them still had a bag mold in them, but most of the time bag molds have not been found in them. Of course since an Iron bag mold will rust if not maintained well in a leather pouch, the bag molds may have been discarded as "rusty junk" long ago and after the period when the pouch was used with a gun. Or the bag mold may have accompanied the gun when it was traded, sold or handed down through inheritance.
The "modern trend" in shooting pouches is back to making smaller "day pouches," and most people don't bother with carrying a bag mold, as they are not going to cast or re-cast the balls around a camp fire at night.
Now of course IF enough people still carried or wanted to carry bag molds in their shooting pouches, there would have been and would be a much larger market for quality bag molds AND made in more HC/PC styles to supply the market demand.
Perhaps Mr. Callahan decided to use a 19th century design for his bag molds as people may be more likely to carry them when doing a 19th century impression? Or maybe he used that design because he had a or some originals to copy? Or maybe he felt it was a better mechanical design? Bottom line is that Mr. Callahan's bag molds have a good reputation and most people who really need/want a bag mold, probably don't care if the mold design is later than 18th century.
Gus