ernbar
45 Cal.
Got in my long awaited 2nd model Uberti Dragoon. The good; well made, nice finish, beautiful wood gips, very accurate, smooth action.
The bad; had a spill that stained the right side of the barrel above the wedge that only came off with light polishing with 0000 steel wool and oil, the nipples were on EXTREMELY tight, all screws were loose one up to one full turn, barrel assembly EXTREMELY tight fitting to the frame needing the use of the loading lever to pop it out of the locating pins.
The nipples were on so tight that I had to use two 7/16” big drill bits inserted in the chambers and mounted on my big vise as a jig. Have a cheap CVA nipple wrench that fit on these cones and used vise grips to clamp on the CVA wrench and used alot of force to finally get them loose. I was very surprised that the wrench actually worked and only had a very light mark where the vise grips gripped the wrench otherwise it looks brand new.
It appears that there are lots of complaints about the tight fitting barrel as I read several on other sites. Some mentioned lightly polishing the locating pins and the two holes for a smoother transition. I have to place the handle of a plastic toothbrush on the cylinder face then use the loading lever to lightly tap it to loosen the barrel. Seems Uberti has a problem with quality control. None of my Piettas had such problems and are less expensive.
Any suggestions on how to work out the tightness that seems to be a little less evident after shooting it and taking the barrel off and on several times?
This monster is very accurate specially at long distances. I hit the metal plate at 75 yards 10 out of 12 rounds with 40 grains of Schuetzen powder and .454 Hornady round ball. At 25 yards was more accurate with 35 grains holding a 2”-3” group. Happy to report that the loading lever did not drop at all but only loaded up to 40 grains so it may drop with higher loads. Will check on that next trip to the range.
Looks massive but compared to the 58 Remington both look similar in size.
The 1851 Navy and 1860 Army both look small compared to the Dragoon.
The bad; had a spill that stained the right side of the barrel above the wedge that only came off with light polishing with 0000 steel wool and oil, the nipples were on EXTREMELY tight, all screws were loose one up to one full turn, barrel assembly EXTREMELY tight fitting to the frame needing the use of the loading lever to pop it out of the locating pins.
The nipples were on so tight that I had to use two 7/16” big drill bits inserted in the chambers and mounted on my big vise as a jig. Have a cheap CVA nipple wrench that fit on these cones and used vise grips to clamp on the CVA wrench and used alot of force to finally get them loose. I was very surprised that the wrench actually worked and only had a very light mark where the vise grips gripped the wrench otherwise it looks brand new.
It appears that there are lots of complaints about the tight fitting barrel as I read several on other sites. Some mentioned lightly polishing the locating pins and the two holes for a smoother transition. I have to place the handle of a plastic toothbrush on the cylinder face then use the loading lever to lightly tap it to loosen the barrel. Seems Uberti has a problem with quality control. None of my Piettas had such problems and are less expensive.
Any suggestions on how to work out the tightness that seems to be a little less evident after shooting it and taking the barrel off and on several times?
This monster is very accurate specially at long distances. I hit the metal plate at 75 yards 10 out of 12 rounds with 40 grains of Schuetzen powder and .454 Hornady round ball. At 25 yards was more accurate with 35 grains holding a 2”-3” group. Happy to report that the loading lever did not drop at all but only loaded up to 40 grains so it may drop with higher loads. Will check on that next trip to the range.
Looks massive but compared to the 58 Remington both look similar in size.
The 1851 Navy and 1860 Army both look small compared to the Dragoon.
Last edited: