sirdutch
32 Cal.
Hello
I purchased a 3rd model dragoon recently and I would like some input on it if anyone is interested. I posted on the THR forum a week or so ago too. Parts of this post are taken from there and I edited it for clarity.
It believe it was assembled by USPFA (or USFA) from what I believe to be U.S. and Uberti supplied parts. At least the barrel is Uberti as it is marked as such. (rather shallowly stamped it might add, under the loading lever). There are no proof marks on the face of the cylinder like I believe would be normal if it was an Uberti supplied cylinder and has no other marks other than the serial number "1937" in all the expected places. I purchased this one in a USPFA black box in the green vapor paper with a USPFA manual, color case hardened curved nipple wrench with spare nipples . It is "in the white". It is not. I repeat, not marked USPFA or USFA. It is in "like new" condition, at least to my untrained eye anyway. I believe it was originally sold in 2002 but I could be mistaken with that.
It seems that after Colt sued USPFA over the use of the word "Patent" in their name, USPFA changed their name to USFA, that USPFA boxed up the remaining cap and ball revolvers they had without marking them as USPFA or USFA and sold them. They then concentrated on manufacturing SAA's instead. It was not clear to me and I am still not sure if this revolver had any work done to them by USPFA or not or if Uberti manufactured these to any better or different standards than the ones they marketed themselves other than they were sold to USPFA "in the white". I've been told that USPFA never bought complete guns, just parts and forgings. They then assembled them to exacting specifications. The action on this gun along with fit and finish is superb. Again,oddly, there are no proof marks on the face of the cylinder that I would have expected after emailing a couple of guys, namely Dr. Jim L. Davis, Founder Replica Percussion Revolver Collector’s Association and Dennis Russell, author of "Percussion Colt Revolvers ”“ The Second Generation ”“ Collector’s Handbook & Price Guide".
My questions are:
Should I have this dragoon finished out with case hardening and bluing or should I leave it the way it is?
Would I lose any collector value with this revolver by finishing it out or would the fact that the revolver is not marked USPFA or USFA just relegate it to be an unfinished Uberti left "in the white"?
I paid $350 for the revolver, which is less than a new Uberti 3rd model dragoon, so no one tried to "sell me" on a USPFA gun. I believe it to be the "real McCoy". I invite anyone with any info that suggests that I might be wrong. I am here on this forum for the truth of the matter.
If anyone knows of a similar gun in a USPFA or USFA box that is not marked USPFA or USFA, please let me know.
All the best to everyone,
Meindert
I purchased a 3rd model dragoon recently and I would like some input on it if anyone is interested. I posted on the THR forum a week or so ago too. Parts of this post are taken from there and I edited it for clarity.
It believe it was assembled by USPFA (or USFA) from what I believe to be U.S. and Uberti supplied parts. At least the barrel is Uberti as it is marked as such. (rather shallowly stamped it might add, under the loading lever). There are no proof marks on the face of the cylinder like I believe would be normal if it was an Uberti supplied cylinder and has no other marks other than the serial number "1937" in all the expected places. I purchased this one in a USPFA black box in the green vapor paper with a USPFA manual, color case hardened curved nipple wrench with spare nipples . It is "in the white". It is not. I repeat, not marked USPFA or USFA. It is in "like new" condition, at least to my untrained eye anyway. I believe it was originally sold in 2002 but I could be mistaken with that.
It seems that after Colt sued USPFA over the use of the word "Patent" in their name, USPFA changed their name to USFA, that USPFA boxed up the remaining cap and ball revolvers they had without marking them as USPFA or USFA and sold them. They then concentrated on manufacturing SAA's instead. It was not clear to me and I am still not sure if this revolver had any work done to them by USPFA or not or if Uberti manufactured these to any better or different standards than the ones they marketed themselves other than they were sold to USPFA "in the white". I've been told that USPFA never bought complete guns, just parts and forgings. They then assembled them to exacting specifications. The action on this gun along with fit and finish is superb. Again,oddly, there are no proof marks on the face of the cylinder that I would have expected after emailing a couple of guys, namely Dr. Jim L. Davis, Founder Replica Percussion Revolver Collector’s Association and Dennis Russell, author of "Percussion Colt Revolvers ”“ The Second Generation ”“ Collector’s Handbook & Price Guide".
My questions are:
Should I have this dragoon finished out with case hardening and bluing or should I leave it the way it is?
Would I lose any collector value with this revolver by finishing it out or would the fact that the revolver is not marked USPFA or USFA just relegate it to be an unfinished Uberti left "in the white"?
I paid $350 for the revolver, which is less than a new Uberti 3rd model dragoon, so no one tried to "sell me" on a USPFA gun. I believe it to be the "real McCoy". I invite anyone with any info that suggests that I might be wrong. I am here on this forum for the truth of the matter.
If anyone knows of a similar gun in a USPFA or USFA box that is not marked USPFA or USFA, please let me know.
All the best to everyone,
Meindert