paulvallandigham
Passed On
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2006
- Messages
- 17,538
- Reaction score
- 87
Great to have that information. NOW, MEASURE YOUR OWN BARREL to see if those dimensions apply!
Seriously, I cannot stress enough that NO buyer should trust the " published dimensions" for any MLing barrel. I have been "stung" Twice, to learn that lesson once and for all.
Measure the Rate of Rifling in the barrel, too.
My last " sting " was a new, custom made "20 gauge fowler", that was pushing a PRB out the barrel at barely over 800 fps with a 75 grain charge of Goex FFg. powder. That load should have given between 1000 and 1100 fps. The .600" diameter and thick denim patch seemed to go down almost too smoothly, but the patches came out looking Okay.
Finally, I measured the bore. It is .626" instead of the nominal .615" for a 20 gauge. That makes my barrel very close to being a 19 GAUGE barrel! I ordered 19 gauge wads, and the first shots over my chronograph showed more than a 200 fps increase in velocity, and a much higher POI on my 25 yard target. I have some .610" diameter lead balls to try in the gun, next, to see if I can get better accuracy with the larger balls.
When I called my gunmaker, he was more than a little upset. He had not measured the bore, either. He had bought the barrel stock from a supplier, from whom he had bought a barrel just a couple of months before to make a similar fowler for himself. He checked his bore diameter, and it was .615". He also made an incorrect assumption that if ordering from the same source, he would get a barrel of comparable dimensions. He was most embarrassed, as He takes great pride in the guns he builds.
I have since talked to barrel makers and they tell me that many of their fellow barrel makers use their cutters too long, and some over order oversized cutters( buttons, broaches) so that they can get more barrels out of them before the expensive cutters have to be replaced. The results are barrels that are both oversized, and undersized.
If you are lucky, the barrel you get was cut when the dimensions are close to nominal dimensions. I am not sure this is the proper explanation for what happened to my barrel, but it should give shooters a nudge to measure the bores of their barrels- regardless of what published information is available, or what caliber, or gauge is marked on the barrel. :hmm:
Seriously, I cannot stress enough that NO buyer should trust the " published dimensions" for any MLing barrel. I have been "stung" Twice, to learn that lesson once and for all.
Measure the Rate of Rifling in the barrel, too.
My last " sting " was a new, custom made "20 gauge fowler", that was pushing a PRB out the barrel at barely over 800 fps with a 75 grain charge of Goex FFg. powder. That load should have given between 1000 and 1100 fps. The .600" diameter and thick denim patch seemed to go down almost too smoothly, but the patches came out looking Okay.
Finally, I measured the bore. It is .626" instead of the nominal .615" for a 20 gauge. That makes my barrel very close to being a 19 GAUGE barrel! I ordered 19 gauge wads, and the first shots over my chronograph showed more than a 200 fps increase in velocity, and a much higher POI on my 25 yard target. I have some .610" diameter lead balls to try in the gun, next, to see if I can get better accuracy with the larger balls.
When I called my gunmaker, he was more than a little upset. He had not measured the bore, either. He had bought the barrel stock from a supplier, from whom he had bought a barrel just a couple of months before to make a similar fowler for himself. He checked his bore diameter, and it was .615". He also made an incorrect assumption that if ordering from the same source, he would get a barrel of comparable dimensions. He was most embarrassed, as He takes great pride in the guns he builds.
I have since talked to barrel makers and they tell me that many of their fellow barrel makers use their cutters too long, and some over order oversized cutters( buttons, broaches) so that they can get more barrels out of them before the expensive cutters have to be replaced. The results are barrels that are both oversized, and undersized.
If you are lucky, the barrel you get was cut when the dimensions are close to nominal dimensions. I am not sure this is the proper explanation for what happened to my barrel, but it should give shooters a nudge to measure the bores of their barrels- regardless of what published information is available, or what caliber, or gauge is marked on the barrel. :hmm: