:hmm:armedOkie said:Period items only.
colorado clyde said:Sure would love to see a picture of it :grin:
It was apparently not uniformly done that way:Loyalist Dave said:For example the males subject to militia duty in my colony, later state, had to provide themselves with musket or rifle, ammunition, tomahawk in lieu of a bayonet, and in some cases rations, but were never told to bring their "haversack". How they transported their food is unknown, but if they went on an extended duty, they would've been issued a haversack, and returned it when mustered out.
SpenceThe Pennsylvania Gazette
November 3, 1779
PHILADELPHIA
GENERAL MILITIA ORDERS .
Philadelphia, October 27, 1779.
THE Classes of the Militia lately called, being designed to co-operate with the fleet of the Count D'Estaing, there will be sufficient time (after authentic advice is received of his arrival on the coast) to reach the rendezvous appointed by his Excellency General Washington. - The directions of the President, as Commander in Chief of the Militia, in the mean time, are ----
That every officer and soldier hold himself in readiness at a day’s notice, equipped in the best manner possible, with a due regard to the season. It is expected that tents will be provided for both officers and soldiers, but the insufficiency of the public stores will require their endeavouring to provide themselves with proper clothing. - It is expected that every one will bring his own blanket and haversack, and though the march will not probably be long, shoes will be an important article, which it is hoped each militia man will not neglect to procure.
I, for one, have always been confused by the term haversack, because I see it used in different ways in the literature of the day. Maybe they were confused, too?Loyalist Dave said:It's pretty doubtful (imho) that a person not part of, nor attached to, the military would have had a haversack, nor would they have called their pack by the term "haversack".
Enter your email address to join: