I think most people use way more than is necessary. IMHOConsidering most .50 cal hunting loads are probably at least 70 grains, 60 in a .58 cal seems pretty light to me. Apparently it did the trick, though.
Patched round ball and minie are completely different animules. Others have stated the CW musket did not need more powder and the minie performed very well with the 60 gr. charge.Considering most .50 cal hunting loads are probably at least 70 grains, 60 in a .58 cal seems pretty light to me. Apparently it did the trick, though.
I read where under certain circumstances 40 grains were used. It is hard to get accurate information some times. I have read respected authors that made mistakes. You may wonder how I know they were wrong? It is easy they were talking about my G.G. Grandfather and I have his records.Why were Civil War muskets typically charged with only 60 grains of powder? Conserve powder? Accuracy? Recoil?
They did lots of testing. That's what they came up with.Why were Civil War muskets typically charged with only 60 grains of powder? Conserve powder? Accuracy? Recoil?
Often historic loads are light.I think most people use way more than is necessary. IMHO
It is relatively light but then it did what was required and then some. The minie ball can be cast with thicker skirts to accommodate heavier charges so if they chose, the Armies of the world could have standardized at 90, 100 grains, or even more. But it wasn’t necessary. A heavy bullet at modest velocity penetrates very well, doesn’t waste a lot of powder, and doesn’t beat the soldier to pieces in the process.Considering most .50 cal hunting loads are probably at least 70 grains, 60 in a .58 cal seems pretty light to me. Apparently it did the trick, though.
Enter your email address to join: