Why won't Hollywood...

[Patrick Hand]

Bear with me on this one; it’s more a bunch of random thought than a well thought out post”¦”¦

On American Civil War movies”¦ from what I heard, Hollywood discovered that they could get a whole bunch of reenactors with complete uniforms and equipment for the same price as extras”¦”¦ Hey”¦”Glory” and “ Gettysburg” were good (for a Hollywood movie)

The genre of Pyrate movies died out”¦ then Disney does “Pyrate of the Caribbean” ”¦ now there are specials about Blackbeard, and Pyrates are kind of back “in””¦..

Rev. War was “in” back during the Bicentennial, and then it kind of died off”¦.

If someone does a Rev. War movie, don’t expect it to be much better than the Pyrate stuff out now”¦”¦.

 

[flaming canvas]

Hey, you gotta problem with sandra or Nicole?

One of the georges would have to played by George Clooney!

We need to correct a common misconception at this time. He's actually George C. Looney. Anything that has to do with reality is beyond his capabilities.

 

[Dave_B]

Hey, you We need to correct a common misconception at this time. He's actually George C. Looney. Anything that has to do with reality is beyond his capabilities.

:rotf: :rotf:
Right on!

Dave

 

[TFoley]

Hey, you gotta problem with sandra or Nicole?

No, either actress would do nicely for the Hollyweird flick on the Revolution. As for George, George C. Scott could be the benevolent, august and serene King George.

As far as King George is concerned, you sadly missed out the word 'nuts'.

tac

 

[musketman]

Hey, you gotta problem with sandra or Nicole?

No, either actress would do nicely for the Hollyweird flick on the Revolution. As for George, George C. Scott could be the benevolent, august and serene King George.

I believe Mr Scott is six feet under at this time, so he would be really serene.

Get Mel Brooks to play the king, he has played a king before on "The History of the World (part 1)"

"It's good to be the king."