Muzzleloader research project.50

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
May 1, 2023
Messages
198
Reaction score
245
Location
Texas
I'm posting this as a long term self project of mine. There Is all too much in fighting about this and that with no proof of anything. I ask that anyone who is willing to participate hear me out. Every animal you take with a muzzleloader should be documented here. Caliber distance shot distance ran projectile amount of powder and gun. This way we can form a bit of evidence to backup claims and help some newbies out. Please feel free to describe performance but no gore for the sake of keeping muzzleloading in a good light.
 
Last edited:
24" 1:48 twist CVA 54 cal 375 gr solid Deerslayer conical 100 grains of RS pyrodex 85 yards.

Broke left shoulder leg bone below joint, passed through heart, lungs and lodged between ribs under skin, far side. Spun on her heels, went 20 yards and died. Zero blood loss, had to search for entry wound. bullet elk.jpegelk.jpgbullet.jpegbullet2.jpeg
 
24" 1:48 twist CVA 54 cal 375 gr solid Deerslayer conical 100 grains of RS pyrodex 85 yards.

Broke left shoulder leg bone below joint, passed through heart, lungs and lodged between ribs under skin, far side. Spun on her heels, went 20 yards and died. Zero blood loss, had to search for entry wound.View attachment 219232View attachment 219233View attachment 219236View attachment 219240
I'm very surprised you didn't get an exit. I'm suspecting the lack of blood trail was because of no exit still quite impressive.
 
I'm very surprised you didn't get an exit. I'm suspecting the lack of blood trail was because of no exit still quite impressive.
Concur. That performance is why I am working on a Thumper Carbine. I want to get a heavier bullet and I want through and through penetration for a blood trail. That was a perfect shot...if it had been less than perfect and it didn't exit, I would have never have found her as there were lots of fresh elk tracks and thick brush the way she was headed. I calculated that 375 gr load had about 1150 ftlbs of energy at 85 yards.

See these threads
https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/...arbine-velocity-results-chronographed.159742/
https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/...acy-results-with-the-thumper-carbines.161070/
My performance parameter goals are: 100 yard zero with 3" or less groups, 125 yard 3" drop maximum, minimum of 1150 ftlbs (I would like 1250 ftlbs) of energy at 125 yards.

So far this 54 cal 450 gr load looks promising, as does the 485 gr load.
 

Attachments

  • 54 450 1530fps.pdf
    298.2 KB
  • 54 cal 485 gr 1582 fps.pdf
    231 KB
Last edited:
Concur. That performance is why I am working on a Thumper Carbine. I want to get a heavier bullet and I want through and through penetration for a blood trail. That was a perfect shot...if it had been less than perfect and it didn't exit, I would have never have found her as there were lots of fresh elk tracks and thick brush the way she was headed.

See these threads
https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/...arbine-velocity-results-chronographed.159742/
https://www.muzzleloadingforum.com/...acy-results-with-the-thumper-carbines.161070/
My performance parameter goals are: 100 yard zero with 3" or less groups, 125 yard 3" drop maximum, minimum of 1150 ftlbs (I would like 1250 ftlbs) of energy at 125 yards.

So far this 54 cal 450 gr load looks promising, as does the 485 gr load.
Pushing it slower might give you better penetration. As counter intuitive as it is. If it expands slightly less it might pass through. If that fails I would cast slightly harder.
 
In a day when the Left is looking to ban every gun under the sun, including lead projectiles, the last thing I would do is post calibers, gory details and pictures to prove muzzleloading "Wound Performance".

Muzzleloaders fly under the radar.

Let's keep it that way.
 
Last edited:
In a day when the Left is looking to ban every gun under the sun, including lead projectiles, the last thing I would do is post calibers, gory details and pictures to prove muzzleloading "Wound Performance".

Muzzleloaders fly under the radar.

Let's keep it that way.
So do we just let pepole be uneducated. Shall we hunt deer with .32 prb because "way back when my paw paw took deer at 100 yards with his 32" I hate to say it there is a good bit of this out there I'm just trying to organize it into some valid research.
 
So do we just let pepole be uneducated
Has nothing to with people remaining uneducated.

Has to do with blood and guts for the sake of blood and guts.

No one, especially the Anti-Gun gun grabbers that frequent every gun forum in America, needs pictures of proven "Wound Performance".

You don't need blood, guts and gore to discuss successful load data.
 
Last edited:
In a day when the Left is looking to ban every gun under the sun, including lead projectiles, the last thing I would do is post calibers, gory details and pictures to prove muzzleloading "Wound Performance".

Muzzleloaders fly under the radar.

Let's keep it that way.
And it's not to prove the wounding performance. Its showing loads that work. Bullets that work. So you dont have to go hmm I wonder if this will humanely take a deer. Bc somone else has tried it and can prove it.
 
I'm posting this as a long term self project of mine. There Is all too much in fighting about this and that with no proof of anything. I ask that anyone who is willing to participate hear me out. Every animal you take with a muzzleloader should be documented here. Caliber distance shot distance ran projectile amount of powder and gun preferably with pictures of wounding and performance. This way we can form a bit of evidence to backup claims.
"Evidence to back up claims" is Proof.
 
This post is not about proving anything. It's not about proving how deadly xyz is. Its about helping pepole out. Yes I did ask about wounding AND performance " and being the key word. But that is not what the post is about.
 
Has nothing to with pepole remaining uneducated.

Has to do with blood and guts for the sake of blood and guts.

No one, especially the Anti-Gun gun grabbers that frequent every gun forum in America, needs pictures of proven "Wound Performance".

You don't need blood, guts and gore to discuss successful load data.
I hate doing this as much as anyone else but you are right. It is not strictly necessary for pictures of the blood and gore. I just wanted to make a page dedicated to culminating information. And I appreciate you pointing out my flaw and I apologize for seeming snapy.
 
I hate doing this as much as anyone else but you are right. It is not strictly necessary for pictures of the blood and gore. I just wanted to make a page dedicated to culminating information. And I appreciate you pointing out my flaw and I apologize for seeming snapy.
Takes a big man to see the error of his ways and admit it publicly.

Get your pen and paper ready.

Lots of load data to be found on this site.
 
Ignore the trolls cluttering up this thread. They complain about everything, rarely, if ever provide positive information and on top of it all, are usually full of crapolla when they do comment.

I bet he closes his eyes when he walks by the meat counter too.

This might even send him over the edge:

meat1.jpg
 
Back
Top