guest5234
32 Cal
Anyone think this is original or repro?
-
Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.
We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.
Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103
fake or good?
- Thread starter guest5234
- Start date
Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 56
that looks nothing like the original lock markings I have seen. I am pretty sure that's a reproduction.
Mike
Mike
The stamping shadow, (bounce, or rebound) looks modern. I'm going with repro. For what it's worth, I like it.
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
- Messages
- 3,199
- Reaction score
- 6,477
Counter sunk screws don’t look right either.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 3,805
- Reaction score
- 2,851
Looks like a restoration, mix of original and reproduction parts.
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 3,805
- Reaction score
- 2,851
Locks were being stamped of that era, I think the British stopped using engravers on locks around the 1780’s.
Very well done reproduction. These people who can antique firearms are amazing. That being said it is a nice gun.
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2020
- Messages
- 7,425
- Reaction score
- 20,765
- Location
- On the Border in Idaho looking at BC
send it to me and i will determine if its fake or not! might take a few years.
It looks like a fine repop.
It looks like a fine repop.
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2018
- Messages
- 37
- Reaction score
- 56
Generally the ordnance markings were both stamped and engaved in that petiod and earlier. There are examples of completely engraved marking including the "TOWER". Generally, the crown was partially stamped and partially hand engraved. There were multiple small stamps used to make up he crown. The shading was hand engraved. Sometimes the cypher was engraved, sometimes stamped. These are all originals dating from 1800 to 1835. The OP one lacks the proper elements to be a real one and it lacks the kings cypher.
MC
Attachments
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 3,805
- Reaction score
- 2,851
Great info and observations, I’ll go with the repro position on the lock.
Last edited:
Others have mentioned the bad stamping. The lock was "wiped" and then an attempt to "restore" it to something more plausible. You can see circled remnants of previous engraving...
LD
LD
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2018
- Messages
- 3,805
- Reaction score
- 2,851
It kind of looks like a new land pattern lock from the 1840’s, the ones that were put on trade guns.
smoothshooter
50 Cal.
I’d say both.
For one thing, the stampings newer than the rest of the gun.
They don’t show any of the light pitting found on the rest of the gun.
Still a cool piece. and is still valuable.
Ya, I thought the scews looked suspicious, too.
Kind of a cool gun, though. I'd clean it up and "restore" it and represent it as a nice repro.
I'm in the repro. camp also, even though someone did a fairly good job of "antiquing" it.
First brass trigger I have ever seen
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
- Messages
- 3,199
- Reaction score
- 6,477
I missed that, first one that I’ve seen on a European gun, plenty on Oriental ones though.
Maybe it's plated? Would a brass trigger be strong enough?
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2005
- Messages
- 3,199
- Reaction score
- 6,477
