• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

36 caliber deer hunting

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
...I'm not here to judge anyone. I personally would not take a .36 PRB deer hunting...
Me either, GSML. Now, starving to death in an apocalypse situation I'd shoot spitballs at 'em if that's all I had....

ETA: Uh-oh, just saw Loyalist Dave's post. Is a spitball too modern? I promise I won't mention them again.
 
The .36 killed A LOT of men. It was considered very capable in that role. The .44 was designed to kill Horses.

I don’t understand all the hand wringing about using a .36 launched from a rifle to kill deer at reasonable ranges.

Muzzleloaders don’t kill with “energy”, they kill by punching holes in things, and the .36 round ball correctly applied to the side of a deer will do just that.

I love my .58’s and .62’s…but having killed lots of stuff with them and my .40’s…I really don’t see much difference in the way deer-sized game reacts. We have Magnumized ourselves into thinking that unless you dump atom-splitting levels of energy into a whitetail deer it just won’t die.

If it will reliably kill a man, it will work on a deer.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top