My, my … now THOSE are bigguns!

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Joined
Dec 30, 2004
Messages
4,883
Reaction score
7,186
Location
New England
Big black powder shoot today. We had a flintlock wall gun, 4 bore, the ball weigh 4 ounces and are almost 1” in diameter.

We were shooting 300-grain loads. I also had my swivel gone, shooting golf balls with 400-grain loads.

Then left to right … a 32, 54, 75 & 4-Bore roundballs.

FYI, the wall gun owner wants to sell it …

IMG_3092.jpeg


IMG_3096.jpeg


Then we had the BIG Swede, courtesy @rickystl, a 1600s Swedish ‘Snaplock’, a lock design using flint for ignition, but maybe prior or around the development of the Snaphaunce or Spanish Miquelet, but definitely almost 100-years before the true French Flintlock.

She is a 75-cal of 46” barrel & NOBODY there had ever seen, never mind heard, of such a beast! She looks ungainly, but the stock design firstly is intriguing and it holds really, really well, even offhand!

IMG_1508.jpeg


Oh, this was my 1st time firing it & my 1st shot and EVERY shot fired afterwards … hit the 10” metal gong @ 50-yards, all offhand to boot!


 
I had an opportunity to buy a wall gun quite a few years back, but at that time I couldn't justify the cost. I don't remember what the guy was asking for it, but it was far above what I could afford then. I've been kicking myself in the rear ever since because I didn't get it.
 
Flint: Good Shoot'n !!!! I knew this gun was going to a good home. I remember it did indeed hold/point well for a 10-lb. gun. The build quality was first rate. It's such a great example of an early 1600 transition to flint ignition. What's also interesting is the butt stock design. It seems during that period there was as much experimentation with different butt stock designs as there was with lock designs.
Thanks so much for the photos and video. Seeing you shoot it totally made my day. And it does indeed sound like it shoots well in your hands.

Rick
 
Someone sent me this …

“The Wall Guns ordered by General Washington were MUCH heavier than that shown and were rifled. They would hit a sheet of paper at 400-yards, but note at the time a ‘sheet of paper’ may have been 4+ times the size of a typical 8.5x11” letter paper we think of today; i.e., think printing press sized. These Wall Rifles would have been useful against arillerymen and other such things that were generally way out of the range of the typical 44 to 50 caliber rifle.”
 
Someone sent me this …

“The Wall Guns ordered by General Washington were MUCH heavier than that shown and were rifled. They would hit a sheet of paper at 400-yards, but note at the time a ‘sheet of paper’ may have been 4+ times the size of a typical 8.5x11” letter paper we think of today; i.e., think printing press sized. These Wall Rifles would have been useful against arillerymen and other such things that were generally way out of the range of the typical 44 to 50 caliber rifle.”
Ive read that them, and the earlier doppelhaken, were somewhat analogous to modern anti material rifles, due to their longer ranger and better ability to damage what they hit. Siege warfare was often trench warfare, so having something that could punch through barricades or harass artillery would certainly be helpful.
 
Love this Dale, and congrats again on the snaplock. And good on you for shooting your stuff: seeing one in action kinda makes me want one!
 
That wall gun is for sale? My wife would actually approve of me buying that thing.

I have a squirrel rifle with a 44-inch barrel. She approves of the length but would like a bit more girth.

What's the asking price???
 

Latest posts

Back
Top