Do You Actually Use Your Expensive Custom Guns or Keep Them as Safe Queens?

I had most of my flintlocks out today, just to look them over…cleaning patch down the bores…etc. I have hunting stories for each and every one of them.

When I use to attend the CLA shows....I wouldn't even touch those nicely built guns on display.

As for me....I finally picked up a nice one a few years ago for 1/2 price....and I shoot it often.
I don't own any safe queens.
In fact, if you saw some of the guns I shoot, you might be wondering how they still work.

I do not believe I would wish to own a firearm I would not shoot. The Daisy BB gun gets used on bird feeder squirrels. The various rifles, ML and suppository, get used on unpredictable whims. The doubles are a whole 'nother topic. Suffice it to say we tend to use a lot more powder and shot than is needed.

With a mild interest in Japanese swords, they are valued like we do fire arms. The condition, age, maker and finish are only a few of the criteria used to rate them. Actual wear from legitimate use or battle damage do not decrease their value. It is the same for a nice fire arm to me.

Use it and take care of it.

Don

Wit the exception of my first rifle a CVA mountain rifle every rifle I have owned was made from scratch. I am not a collector so they have all been used extensively. When I no longer shoot one then it is time to find it a new home.

Second-rate Marksman said:

What are the merits of owning a dozen $500 guns (or a half-dozen $1,000 guns) versus one $6,000 one?

Click to expand...

I can answer that one. Well, I can give you a generic answer, and then my reasoning, anyway.

1: More varied experiences. Owning 1 gun vs 12 means the owner only gets the one experience. If it's a rifle, no handgun experience. Flint, no percussion, ML no centerfire, etc. The experience of (the act of) shooting that one gun doesn't really change that much.
2: Many don't really have $6k all at once to drop on luxury items. Those dozen guns may have been bought 1-2 per year over 6 years time. It's a big difference. Plus if something happens to a $500 gun, it's less costly to replace or just to deal with being out that money.

So for me personally, I like to be a blend of the 2? I've seen peoples collections, just racks and racks of stuff in a room they had built to act as a safe. Or even slightly more modest collections in 1-3 large safes. I'm not that guy. I don't want to have them just to have them. I'd rather have a small collection that I can enjoy seeing, handling, and shooting; without having to relearn the Dewey Decimal System just to find the dang things and remember what I have.

Having said that, my finances are limited. A $6,000 gun is generally outside my reach, and that's if I could even justify it to myself. I mean, if I really truly wanted it, I might be able to sell every gun I own that's in shootable condition and afford it. Maybe, if I put work into private sales and got better than gun store offerings. But outside of that I think I'd be short over $1k. (though if you add up the price I paid I get a bit over. Yay me). So for me, I'd rather slow build, and have a little variety.


In another post you talked about wanting to honor what the gun was built for, and that's to be shot, hunted with, etc. I agree with that statement in general, but I might argue specifics.

Take a nice flintlock rifle. You start with a plain maple stock, quality barrel, plain blue/black steel parts, no carving, no engraving. It's a rifle, and it was made to shoot. It might be attractive, but it's clear that it was made to shoot and no special considerations were made for appearance (well, lets say the stock is shaped in some particular style, but there's no adornment. Just not a slab.)
Now you can make choices beyond that: higher grade wood/polishing work, deep blue finish/case hardening, polished brass parts, metal inlays, pewter nose caps, stock engraving, metal engraving, etc. All of those add cost, but they're all simply aesthetic. They exist to be seen, they don't really aid the shooting, and likely aren't even noticed during that act.

The more of those choices that are made, the less it becomes something built for shooting, and the more it becomes a visual art piece. It still can be shot, but the ratio of shooter/art piece leans heavily towards the art end. Potentially so much so that anything beyond putting it out for display might actually be taking away from it's main purpose.

I'd still shoot it though. Boom, baby, boom.

Nazgul58 said:

With a mild interest in Japanese swords, they are valued like we do fire arms. The condition, age, maker and finish are only a few of the criteria used to rate them. Actual wear from legitimate use or battle damage do not decrease their value. It is the same for a nice fire arm to me.

Use it and take care of it.

Don

Click to expand...

The nest Japanese sword makers are considered national treasures. I have two rifles and some knives by three gentlemen who I consider national treasures.

Second-rate Marksman said:

I d


I don’t know that I want to do that… might need some guns that I can actually use to effectively defend myself against a tyrannical government one day.

Click to expand...

You actually think that anything firearm related, that you own will make a difference if that day comes? I don't.

Jedidiah said:

You actually think that anything firearm related, that you own will make a difference if that day comes? I don't.

Click to expand...

You must start with something. A knife for a pistol, pistol for a rifle , rifle for a gunship!
The last may be a big jump.

Jedidiah said:

You actually think that anything firearm related, that you own will make a difference if that day comes? I don't.

Click to expand...

Vietnam and Afghanistan outlasted us using stone age tech. All we need to do it to shoot the SOB who has a better weapon than we have, and take it. Or wait for Biden to give it to you. Even the cheap single shot Liberty pistols of WW2 had their place, if only for moral support.