Search results

I know the India guns were all copied from original samples so Sarco gun parts Corporation Dixie and other generic internal parts will fit with a little bit of gunsmithing

Thanks Rifleman I looked that up loyalist Dave was asking about the same thing and Mr person stated Tower would have been correct for the pedis solely model this darn phone autocorrects everything

I follow a lot of the posts you guys have on accuracy in reproduction. Some obvious mistakes have been built into muzzleloaders from the start! A few that I know of are as follows. Japanese gun maker Miroku received a brown bess years ago to copy from original ....problem was it had been dropped...

Try some of the online auction sites I recently picked up a walker for $200 in like new unfired condition from amoskeag in New Hampshire

It's probably a shill company set up by the DNC to get Americans to pay for all the presidential screw UPS🦊

I have four from military heritage one Miroku and one pedersoli the poll needs to include....... I have India derangement syndrome

Agree a modicum of work is necessary! I generally spend 8 to 10 hours going over every part on my India built flintlocks but then again I enjoy the work

Got to love those old Great Plains rifles my dad had one years ago

I agree ! I recently read a pole that found 50% of all muzzle loading community supported well made India guns yes they need tuning yes they need refinishing yes they need work but so does a $1,200 kit from some of the pricier American custom shops that sell these kits 4A re-enactor on a budget...

Sorry I don't know how my post was separated from the discussion on Italian flintlocks by pedersoli I was adding that kit ravenscheer does a good job correcting all the incorrect information like the date ,modern markings, and plastic coated stock to make the Italian guns more suitable for...

Kit Ravenshear does good work correcting the markings that are incorrect along with correct fittings like the longer tang on buttstock to name just a few

Awesome thanks for posting 🦊

The only problem with Italian guns is defarbing all the barrel writing and Italian proofs along with the plastic finish they use that is tough to remove after that you have a decent gun for reenacting

It has a nice patina good lookin gun

Yes after more than 80 years serving the military police and Industrial community they closed just a couple of years ago... this particular study was done on behalf of a re-enactor who wanted to sue the manufacturer the metal was found to be high quality Steel and the only reason it failed was...

Agree in fact I found one of the makers on the internet at no other place but YouTube and it was the same manufacturer who made my flintlocks from military heritage if you go on YouTube it's under fabulous India firearm reproduction or you can just search YouTube as India Flintlock and it will...

Welcome from Georgia CVA made a pretty good gun back in the day that's a good start have you developed any loads yet

I've been shooting black-powder now for 40 years and they used to say the Italian guns were crap nobody would touch them because they were considered inferior now the tide has changed and magically Italian guns are considered Superior well I'm not buying it I'll stick with the guns that I have...

There's a great video on YouTube a guy who bought one from track of the Wolf it was crap also and cost him 1200 dollars

Two of my guns from military heritage both spark well a musket on top is a French trade gun the bottom is a 1733 French pistol I love both of them but the pistol has a little more figure in the teak stock both take a 62 caliber round ball and shoot to point of aim I use 80 grains of double F in...