Tumblernotch
69 Cal.
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2005
- Messages
- 3,370
- Reaction score
- 11
I also clean and oil the threads on my nipples and bolsters and it is the key to long nipple life I think.
I don't know how long that nipple had been in the rifle before I got it. Besides lack of cleaning, it had been subjected to very high pressures (for black powder) for Lord knows how long. And, I believe that it's possible that someone used an American NFT nipple in it when they should have used a British Standard Thread. I shot it for a while with no problems until while clearing a blank load (at high elevation) after a battle re-enactment, the blowback threw the hammer back violently, breaking the tumbler at the stirrup pin. That's when I discovered the problem.
I tend to agree with your last theory. The nipple had obviously been in the gun for a long time and the various conditions you mention would have been in play. The rifle is a very low serial numbered Whitworth and probably had the nipple installed in the late 70's to early 80's and had several years for the damage to evolve. It's hard to tell what happened first, but it appears that melting of the nipple began from the inside and worked its way to the thread area. It was a Venturi type design which probably shouldn't have been used in a weapon with a high breech pressure. The one I'm using now has a very small orifice with a thick body.
Methinks we may be drifting away from the original subject. But interesting just the same.
I don't know how long that nipple had been in the rifle before I got it. Besides lack of cleaning, it had been subjected to very high pressures (for black powder) for Lord knows how long. And, I believe that it's possible that someone used an American NFT nipple in it when they should have used a British Standard Thread. I shot it for a while with no problems until while clearing a blank load (at high elevation) after a battle re-enactment, the blowback threw the hammer back violently, breaking the tumbler at the stirrup pin. That's when I discovered the problem.
I tend to agree with your last theory. The nipple had obviously been in the gun for a long time and the various conditions you mention would have been in play. The rifle is a very low serial numbered Whitworth and probably had the nipple installed in the late 70's to early 80's and had several years for the damage to evolve. It's hard to tell what happened first, but it appears that melting of the nipple began from the inside and worked its way to the thread area. It was a Venturi type design which probably shouldn't have been used in a weapon with a high breech pressure. The one I'm using now has a very small orifice with a thick body.
Methinks we may be drifting away from the original subject. But interesting just the same.