Ok, here we go again....shooting a .50 cal Hawken percussion rifle, 80gr (by volume) Pyrodex, patched balls, 100 yds. Aiming at the same 3" spot, shooting offhand, I put 26 shots all within a 24" dia. circle. Does this suck, or is this normal for a round ball at 100 yds? I tried a few shots with those "pseudo-sabots" (the ones with the plastic part attached to the back of the copper jacketed conical slug, can't remember the real name) and got a better grouping. I expected this from a pointy bullet, but I hate using them: the more you shoot, the harder they are to put in the barrel. Plus they cost too much compared to balls. Is this normal? Or am I expecting too much out of a colonial era weapon? Waddaya think? :: :hmm:
bdarin; It seems those more proficient than myself seem to think your "pattern" is less than desireable. For 26 shots I think it is pretty much what I may expect from my self with my .54 cal, and perhaps just a bit more than I would expect from .50.... but not by much.
:relax:Lighten up on yourself just a bit, it's not the end of the world! If the truth be known, you might well be in the winners circle with those off hand groups once all the off-hand scores are turned in.
My own .50 is a Penn Hunter cap buster with peep sights that will do better than 3" from the bench for five shots. My first five shots "off-hand" will sometimes better the 10" mark but more often than not, it is larger....sometimes much larger. Ten shots "off-hand" with the .50 seldom give me less than 15-20 inches....including all those I mis-called when the shot broke.
80gr pyrodex in the .50 is NOT my "target shootin" load. It does come quite close to my hunting load using FFg Goex at 95gr, which is a load I settled on as giving me the best of two worlds in accuracy and velocity.
Perhaps I'm just a lousy "off-hand" shot with the .50 and the .54 but Yat-ta-hay! That's real life.
OTH, my .58 cal Colt Musket using 42gr (weighed) FFFg will give me a better "off-hand" group than either of the supposingly more accurate sporting rifles...but only for five or six shots. (This may be something you want to try...give it your best for 5/6 shots, take a short break, and back to another 5/6 shots...it may look a little different)
Shooting off-hand is a skill that takes years to develop and it seems one never gets it just right. That's why I use a rest at every opportunity. (More pleasing to the soul, it seems.)
I also have two sight "pictures", because I know my off-hand has a different impact than my bench zero, and that's okay, I accept that.
The local guys around here just love to see me show up at shoots, that's probably why I get so many invitations... They know they won't be last when I show up!
But "Kattie Bar the Door" when we shoot three position! I have a lot more wins / places to my credit than losses, and I think it's because I accept the fact that I'm not an Olympic Class shooter when it comes to off-hand,(or any other position, for that matter.) I just do my best and let the cards fall where they may.
IMHO....26 shots, at 100 yd. all in 24", off-hand just ain't as bad as it sounds up front, anyone doubting this needs only to try it. But that's just my thoughts.
Russ