• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

58 good and bad

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Trust rate is 1-48”….. So I’m willing to bet it should stabilize the REAL. My PBR shoots exceptionally well with only 75gr of FFg .

Im thinking the REAL will take a good bit more tho.
 
Trust rate is 1-48”….. So I’m willing to bet it should stabilize the REAL. My PBR shoots exceptionally well with only 75gr of FFg .

Im thinking the REAL will take a good bit more tho.
1x48 worked good in my rifle. like to hear your results
 
Slugged bore to see fit. Rite barrel tighter. So if two Real bullets… Should shoot Left barrel 1st.
F3FBE2C8-6A2C-4DA3-85CF-0503C6B3B886.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 249EA9B0-01B7-4A82-A8A7-09656B3CD435.jpeg
    249EA9B0-01B7-4A82-A8A7-09656B3CD435.jpeg
    37.9 KB
We're subject to police inspections without notice here, guns and ammo must be locked at all times. A friend lost his licence for having a full shotgun belt sitting on instead of in the safe and for having a rusted out, missing bolt 303 that wasn't functional but that he hadn't registered.

That sounds absolutely horrible and full on police state. Time for a revolt over there
 
I have a .58 Hawken rifle with a Green Mountain barrel. I really love that rifle. Super accurate. 50 grains of powder it is not unpleasant to shoot.
 
I've been keeping an eye out as well as proactively speaking with some people e.g. Jim chambers, about a rifled flintlock.

I would never part with my rocky mountain .54 caplock so I thought the next logical thing would be to get a 58 (I also own an inline and caplock 50). I just wanted a point of difference so I didn't have two of the same cal and end up using just one like I do with my 50s.

But what are the real pros and cons to a .58 over a .54? I've had the opportunity to buy a couple of .54s and have passed thus far.

I mostly hunt red deer which for arguments sake let's call elk size, I like the idea of having a good size ball for taking them on quartering to shots and such as I like to roar them in during the rut meaning that often frontal or near frontal shots are common.

I just want it to shoot point of aim at 100 yards and to be able to shoot minute of whitetail at that range.

Thinking logically I can see that a 58 would likely hit a bit harder but also drop a bit quicker. Recoil doesn't really bother me.

Any other considerations to swing me one way or another?
I've been keeping an eye out as well as proactively speaking with some people e.g. Jim chambers, about a rifled flintlock.

I would never part with my rocky mountain .54 caplock so I thought the next logical thing would be to get a 58 (I also own an inline and caplock 50). I just wanted a point of difference so I didn't have two of the same cal and end up using just one like I do with my 50s.

But what are the real pros and cons to a .58 over a .54? I've had the opportunity to buy a couple of .54s and have passed thus far.

I mostly hunt red deer which for arguments sake let's call elk size, I like the idea of having a good size ball for taking them on quartering to shots and such as I like to roar them in during the rut meaning that often frontal or near frontal shots are common.

I just want it to shoot point of aim at 100 yards and to be able to shoot minute of whitetail at that range.

Thinking logically I can see that a 58 would likely hit a bit harder but also drop a bit quicker. Recoil doesn't really bother me.

Any other considerations to swing me one way or another?
 
Given the choice between a .54 and a .58 I would take the .58 . If I already owned the same gun in a .54 I would save my money for something else , not that much difference between the two in my opinion .
 
And better with a felt under the base , much much more better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!/Ed
maybe it would but my rifle is plenty accurate with no felt wad. it is so easy to load with the bullet on the powder charge do not want to get into felt thickness which lube to use etc
 
maybe it would but my rifle is plenty accurate with no felt wad. it is so easy to load with the bullet on the powder charge do not want to get into felt thickness which lube to use etc
No lube standard felt from Dura felt and make your own , as plenty accurate is in the eyes of the trigger puller and until you try o well !
 
I own a 62 cal smootbore flintlock, but I just don't see it getting the range to do much big game hunting. L

We don't treestand hunt here, we either spot and stalk or most commonly stalk, which for some reason you fellas call still hunting?

I could see if I was in a treestand and had a deer pass really close the smoothy would be handy.

I mostly just want a rifled flintlock and want to make sure it gets used. I could go the other way and get a 50 cal but that's legally not going to be enough for a deer here (220 grain min projectile). Not that I've heard of anyone ever being pulled up on bullet weight.
 
I shoot a Green River Rifle Works 58 fullstock flintlock rifle, that I've owned for 35 years or so. My son uses a 54 Lyman we both load almost the exact powder load & i actually load less than Jeremiah does. My 58 has a lot more knock down power though. I have never had to track a deer & I only had to shoot one buck twice. I hit him in the neck but an inch or so low, it still knocked him off his feet & shocked him enough i reloaded and finished it. It was a huge whitetail too. If you have a choice buy the 58 that handles round ball exclusive. You won't be sorry you did
 
Back
Top