I still believe that the main idea of a long barrel fowler in a smaller bore whose length average 5 plus feet was because black powder was not has strong has what we use today , has we all know that black powder gains its strength has it burns up the barrel so therefore the long barrel .For double charging to me will not increase the range it was more than likely that most of the powder would leave the muzzle not ignited.
I have enclosed a image of a flintlock converted too percussion fowler in 9 bore with a 62inch barrel build approximately about 1780 which would have used the poor grade powder of the day , in the past I used this gun for shooting geese and ducks on flight lines and the powder I used was a standard 12 bore load of 2.3/4 drms of Curtiss and Harvey FFg which is a medium grade of powder to 1.1/4 oz of number 4 or 5 shot which resulted in shooting many a goose and duck to a distance of 50 to 60 yards
Feltwad
I have enclosed a image of a flintlock converted too percussion fowler in 9 bore with a 62inch barrel build approximately about 1780 which would have used the poor grade powder of the day , in the past I used this gun for shooting geese and ducks on flight lines and the powder I used was a standard 12 bore load of 2.3/4 drms of Curtiss and Harvey FFg which is a medium grade of powder to 1.1/4 oz of number 4 or 5 shot which resulted in shooting many a goose and duck to a distance of 50 to 60 yards
Feltwad
Last edited: