Kapow said:
In that case I would consider it a serious design flaw that needs to be corrected. There should be no way that the hammer can contact the cap at half cock. On my rifle it does and I believe that the hammer got snagged and pulled back just a small amount, then fell forward and contacted the cap before the fly could engage.
If this does happen with the new lock I will have to drill or grind the hammer face and shorten the nipple. Even then I think I will employ some type of safety mechanism while hunting. Plan B is go to flintlock.
It's a shame because I have really been enjoying this rifle.
In your earlier post you suggested people pull their hammers back to almost full cock and let them fly forward. This is not a good idea. It can damage your lock!
And, as I have said, at just the right degree, the lock will fire!
It's not a design flaw, it's just the way the lock works. You can put your Chevy in neutral, rev the engine to 6000 RPM, and then shift into Drive too. But you're not supposed to!!! Don't do it!!!
If your hammer does contact the capped nipple when at rest in the half-cock position(which you should be able to determine without letting the hammer fly forward) then you DO have a problem with your rifle! And it needs attention!
I just don't think the problem is with the lock. It could be any number of things from a too-tall nipple, crud under the nipple not allowing it to be fully seated, barrel inlet too shallow, lock inlet too low, ... :idunno: hard to say from half-way around the world. If we were closer I'd offer to look at it. Good luck figuring out the true root cause of the problem.
Sorry, I don't know if the half-cock is higher on the L&R replacement lock. :idunno: