The Forum is not a cell phone nor business document..
Definitely not a cell phone. But in terms of the types of communications in the forum -- particularly those more technical ones in which acronyms tend to flourish -- it is a kind of business document. Whether you call it a business document or not, a lot of threads on this forum about rifles, pistols, powder, history, etc. have the same goals in terms of exposition, presentation, and explanation. Acronyms, if used correctly and judiciously, can make reading such discussions easier rather than harder.
FishDfly" said:
Why should I go to Goggle to find out what you are saying?
Your choice. If a posting is unintelligible to me for ANY reason, I will likely just stop reading it. If I have the feeling that something worthwhile to me is being said, I might then expend a bit more effort in understanding it. Otherwise not. That's a personal choice I feel comfortable making.
FishDfly" said:
Or it could be just a minor thoughtlessness or similar to using a particular technical term (like "patent breech" or "frizzen").
I don't mind looking up important terminology, or terminology that helps me understand postings -- or figuring out what "TOW" means.
Or "NMLRA" or "ML" or "BP" or "OP" or "TC" -- all of which you've used in postings yourself.
Draw that line wherever you like, and complain about those on the other side of it being lazy, but there's really no moral high ground on your own side. Using acronyms is probably not a moral failing -- just bad writing style if not done carefully.