• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

alert! #10 caps, free hazmat at natchez

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
They're not out of stock, just ordered a 1,000. Don't forget to enter the hazmat discount code FH221219. #10 caps $106.99, Fed-ex shipping $15.82, tax $8.70, Total $131.51

Natchez CCI #10 Caps
 
For what it's worth it is my experience that the CCI version of the No. 10 cap is too small to fit a No. 11 nipple. Remington No. 10 fits pistols and rifles ok, but a CCI #10 is too small for a percussion revolver or a rifle. Unless they are making them larger now. Back in the day I had to turn down a rifle nipple just for the CCI #10s.

Bob
 
For what it's worth it is my experience that the CCI version of the No. 10 cap is too small to fit a No. 11 nipple. Remington No. 10 fits pistols and rifles ok, but a CCI #10 is too small for a percussion revolver or a rifle. Unless they are making them larger now. Back in the day I had to turn down a rifle nipple just for the CCI #10s.

Bob
You are correct. CCI #10s are slightly smaller than Remington #10s. I used to have a good, easy to read, chart showing the dimensions of each brand. Can't find it now. But my revolvers will take the CCI, very snug, but works for me.
 
Rule of thumb, any internet store that charges your states tax, I do not deal with and they always charge too much. Not to mention its unconstitutional.
Sorry, but not unconstitutional. In the court case of South Dakota vs Wayfair the United States Supreme Court ruled that businesses have to collect state sales tax on sales made in states where they do "substantial business". They ruled "substantial business" to mean 200 or more transactions or the sale of $100,000 or more per year. Therefore, a lot of internet businesses MUST collect your states' sales taxes when they sell you something on line even if you live in Idaho and the business selling you the merchandise is located in Ohio. Many internet businesses will collect your states' sales taxes just to be safe since they have no way of predicting if their sales to your state will exceed the "substantial business" definition.
 
That's ALSO true, but if the store also happens to be in your state, you're going to pay your state sales tax regardless.
Not only that, if the item you are buying comes from out of state but the company you're buying from has a business in your state you'll be charged sales tax.
 
Rule of thumb, any internet store that charges your states tax, I do not deal with and they always charge too much. Not to mention its unconstitutional.
Sales tax became mandatory for all but 5 states in April 2021. The auction or business have a tax calculator the tax is calculated at time of purchase via your zip code. You're very limited to making purchases and not to be taxed.

Even if you beat the out of state tax at the time of purchase. You are required to claim it on you state income tax.
 
Sorry, but not unconstitutional. In the court case of South Dakota vs Wayfair the United States Supreme Court ruled that businesses have to collect state sales tax on sales made in states where they do "substantial business". They ruled "substantial business" to mean 200 or more transactions or the sale of $100,000 or more per year. Therefore, a lot of internet businesses MUST collect your states' sales taxes when they sell you something on line even if you live in Idaho and the business selling you the merchandise is located in Ohio. Many internet businesses will collect your states' sales taxes just to be safe since they have no way of predicting if their sales to your state will exceed the "substantial business" definition.
Correct, "unconstitutional" gets tossed around a little too freely.

To quote Inigo Montoya "I don't think that means, what you think it means"
 
Back
Top