• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

British Light Sea Service Dragoon project !

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Finally got the entry pipe inletted !
Went pretty good….but I will say it’s easier to install one from scratch then to try and match/hide one into an existing spot ! 🥴
2A5C410B-59B8-41A1-B2A3-07078BA7C40E.jpeg
46B24EC0-98C5-49A6-8A39-2C9664831322.jpegF35BC999-A08E-45CE-A7B7-F5B020421230.jpeg9F8F06BA-12A2-4BC0-B3A2-FA6A5F39EC63.png

Still gotta shape down the forestock to match the new profile of the pipe and deepen up the rod channel to line up with the now “higher” pipe !
Definitely was worth doing the pipe….imo a big improvement over what it came with 👍
 
That's got to be one of the nicest jobs of making an entry pipe that wasn't originally intended for that to not only just work but also to be beautifully inlet and look like it belongs. :) :thumb:
 
What size flint does this thing take?
There are some slight differences in the lock works from gun to gun on these Indias….
On mine a 5/8 x 5/8 fits this one about
perfect 👍
Although the frizzen is generously wide so you could go wider…maybe 3/4 ? any longer then 5/8 on mine it’ll touch the frizzen face at half **** 🤔
 
There are some slight differences in the lock works from gun to gun on these Indias….
On mine a 5/8 x 5/8 fits this one about
perfect 👍
Although the frizzen is generously wide so you could go wider…maybe 3/4 ? any longer then 5/8 on mine it’ll touch the frizzen face at half **** 🤔
Perfect then I've already got some 5/8s AND 3/4ths I might go ahead and invest in one 😜
 
Yup, more wood to remove- and your doing it 👍🏻
I’m looking at how much of the barrel is still hidden in the stock. If you take some of that channel wall down so that the barrel is exposed more (as in the entire top half) your pistol will certainly be far less bulky.
Here’s an example of what I mean.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3319.jpeg
    IMG_3319.jpeg
    4.1 MB
Last edited:
Yep you got an eye !!! 👍
Marked where the barrel rested along the top edge…..definitely was not exposed to halfway at the breech end.
E055BC89-12E4-49CB-9D32-2A7F7DA33396.jpeg

So we did just that….removed at least 3/16” to a 1/4” off the top back towards the breech end ! It really was alot of wood 😳
28540A0C-51F6-4581-8E0A-18D0613BB84E.png
2DCF8228-46BD-482B-BD26-A3D420DC7B4F.jpeg

Certainly helped “slender” down the look alot !
DD2C1F9B-6765-4D37-98AE-7CCB319EC72E.jpeg


Thanks for the eye 😎👍
 
Yep you got an eye !!! 👍
Marked where the barrel rested along the top edge…..definitely was not exposed to halfway at the breech end.
View attachment 358678

So we did just that….removed at least 3/16” to a 1/4” off the top back towards the breech end ! It really was alot of wood 😳
View attachment 358679
View attachment 358680

Certainly helped “slender” down the look alot !
View attachment 358681


Thanks for the eye 😎👍
Quite a difference!
The top of the forearm doesn’t look straight ( bows slightly upward forward of the side panel) but might be the photo. Easy to check with a straight edge. Keep the thickness uniform as well.
Now just one suggestion: consider gently tapering and roll over the top of the stock at the muzzle which gives it a graceful flow (though this might not be appropriate for this style pistol).
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3320.jpeg
    IMG_3320.jpeg
    6.2 MB
Last edited:
Quite a difference!
The top of the forearm doesn’t look straight…
Yep she’s dead nuts straight…checked with a steel rule…my vintage iPhone takes garbage pics 😜
Now just one suggestion: consider gently tapering and roll over the top of the stock at the muzzle which gives it a graceful flow (though this might not be appropriate for this style pistol).
That does look really good ! Hard to say what the standard on these later sea service pistols was….some look squared off, some look rounded, most I’ve seen in person and pics are pretty worn on the leading edges….hard to say really other then I don’t think I’ve found two the same yet 🤷🏻‍♂️🤣

Some original pics I’ve scabbed off the net…
8CA0EC0B-69BF-460F-A937-047CCAB108E7.png8E35D345-5A4A-4304-87FC-1EADD966F20A.png322EE61F-0D4F-474D-AF8A-7E9CF25B18D0.png2B3E4FFD-E7D7-42FF-8ECE-45C7E6D5FA16.png
Probably just try and emulate something in the middle 🤔
 

Attachments

  • D147DCD3-840B-4150-92C5-0C7CDC4AA6C9.png
    D147DCD3-840B-4150-92C5-0C7CDC4AA6C9.png
    928.1 KB
Okay thats it…..I’m gonna say this is the final shaping/slimming done !
Took the grip down abit more behind the panels, flattened down and dished the beavertail around the tang…it was abit too “proud” before and didn’t look quite right.
Just some final sanding left and onto the finish 😎
48B09504-CBCE-4EFF-8F36-C1ECB7AE9715.jpeg8804C781-B6EF-43C4-80DF-097AD64652D2.jpeg487C48AA-5973-450B-B000-38038B374B03.jpeg0E0F1E17-6AA7-42E6-9980-6F38C3CE6AE7.jpeg
0CDAD57D-B5BA-4D5A-851D-3A87358CA517.png
 
Last edited:
Back
Top