• If you have bought, sold or gained information from our Classifieds, please donate to Muzzleloading Forum and give back.

    You can become a Supporting Member which comes with a decal or just click here to donate.

  • Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

CLOSED Brown Bess ~ See Revised Listing.

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 20, 2021
Messages
27
Reaction score
71
I recently restored this vintage reproduction. I am not sure on the make but the consensus here seems to be that it is an early Pedersoli. The stock was completely refinished and restored. The brass polished up and the barrel and lock carefully brought back to life. The springs are in EXCELLENT condition. The bore is in excellent condition, with little to no pitting or issues that I can see. The ball/patch rams home very smooth and easy. I have test fired this Bess a few times and she is a straight shooter and I would have no hesitation at all using this for elk or deer hunting, or grouse, pheasant, turkey or waterfowl. She is the perfect smoothbore for someone who reenacts and wants a solid, working flintlock without all of the glamour and fuss. This old girl is a workhorse, not a show pony.

She comes as shown. The barrel length is 37", overall length is 53". LOP is 14".

I am asking $1200, plus shipping. Not interested in trades, sorry.

394714818_1019784832473581_4171375720141267808_n.jpg

393877287_344183278119263_6293698407749495969_n.jpg

394280582_344250851354089_1263243229476857069_n.jpg

394420233_2879738838830202_2180888649107761469_n.jpg

393800093_1413681089210846_3071589428166848323_n.jpg

394315119_1107198160242666_4996786757698613339_n.jpg

393838757_6622584054524555_3230902732578831428_n.jpg


IMG_5159.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Pretty obvious a pedersoli lock....

Can you post up a photo of your username and date next to it?
 
Last edited:
Pretty obvious a pedersoli lock....

Can you post up a photo of your username and date next to it?

Seems too inexpensive for the quality of the piece....questionable in my mind

I don’t think it is. Pedersoli is pretty solid about branding their work and this musket has NO makers marks anywhere on it. The only thing was the odd two digit number on some of the parts.
 
Pretty obvious a pedersoli lock....

Can you post up a photo of your username and date next to it?
I will post as requested later tonight when I get back home. I’ve actually revise the price to a more appropriate one after some private messages saying the same thing you did.
 
The Japanese Bess's had this odd angled look to the bow of the triggerguards. Did you straighten it? If not, I agree it's a Pedersoli and not Japanese. Nice job bringing her back to life!
 
The early Japanese ones had a flattened trigger guard because Miroku copied every detail of the example they were given, right down to the flattened trigger guard. Unless the guard was reworked or replaced, those people who looked at it are wrong.

Back in the early 70s, parts were being made and imported, with stocks and assembly done here by Navy Arms. It is quite possible this is one of those.
 
I don’t think it is. Pedersoli is pretty solid about branding their work and this musket has NO makers marks anywhere on it. The only thing was the odd two digit number on some of the parts.
Without being argumentative , it’s a Pedersoli. Miroku used “Tower” on their locks and pedersoli says “Grice 1762”. Not that big a deal.
 
Can you post a picture of the pitting in the bore?
Turns out there is little to no pitting. It looked like there was after a quick cleaning after I restored it but I had not looked at the bore since test firing and cleaning. I think the few rounds that I sent through it scrubbed out what grime my brushed didn't because the bore is very nice indeed. I tried to get a couple of pictures but it was shiny enough that it was difficult to get a decent photograph because of all of the reflection going on in there. So, I revised the listing to better reflect the condition of the bore.


395196371_660978322807218_4996132590383355885_n.jpg395453194_276911418660484_5576443531284471497_n.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 395453194_276911418660484_5576443531284471497_n (1).jpg
    395453194_276911418660484_5576443531284471497_n (1).jpg
    370.2 KB
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top