• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

Building a 1750s English fowler

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Hi Dave,

I found your explanation of the period charcoal bluing process and why you decided not to do it very interesting.

Your post reminded me of how for many years now, since at least the early 1980's, I have often wondered how they got the deep Royal Blue on the rear 1/3 or less of 18th/19th century Naval Sword Blades and some blades were colored that way throughout their length. I had ruled out charcoal bluing as that finish is not known to last long and certainly not into the latter part of the 20th century. I also don't think they would have wanted to screw up the tempering of the sword by doing charcoal bluing?


Anyway, I REALLY admire the colour you came up with. It looks GREAT!

Gus
 
Love the deep color! Have done some easy restoration mostly wood, no metal yet. What is LMF browning and what does carding mean? Like I said I’m green. Thanks Art.
 
Hi Dave,

While looking for something else, this thread caused me to recognize a Fowler with a breech and rear sight like the one on your gun.

"Of Sorts for Provincials," Page 49-52.

Fowling Gun by John Bumford of London, circa 1750-1760, Barrel length 41", Caliber .64.

For those who might not have books on period Fowlers, this is one to see if one has this book.

Gus
 
Hi,
Thanks Gus. Well I finally got back to the fowler and finished it. I am scrambling to get ready for Dixons so won't include any narrative about it. I'll post more info when I get back next week. I'll have the gun at Dixons so come visit the ALR tent.

Enjoy.

dave
NPoKvz1.jpg

KJxeFK5.jpg

LrJOkmP.jpg

rBwDyRz.jpg

sJ3ExgI.jpg

6KB59AS.jpg

p1GC9wV.jpg

dvAKO1a.jpg

BlCxhnm.jpg

ddgH0IP.jpg

18pS7Et.jpg

1HPiYwv.jpg

rEnzDG7.jpg

hPIRFRn.jpg

8uCwHKg.jpg

vMLAxTd.jpg

QSFsKSR.jpg

QoShVUm.jpg
 
The beauty of that gun surpasses my ability to express. The gun, and your skills, exemplify the best of what this ml game is all about. Preserving appreciation of history and the skills of those who came before us. Viewing those excellent pics left me breathless.
 
Hi Dave

That is a magnificent piece of work. A true beauty. It looks sooooo representative of the period, and of the highest quality. You are a real master of your craft.

Rick
 
Hi,
This is an excerpt from a post on another forum.

In this post I want to discuss my choices of decoration and engraving, and finishing the gun. Although ornate wire inlayed guns like those made by William Bailes, William Simpson, and others exist,

JIlW3Un.jpg


British fowlers during 1740-1770 mostly had simple shell carving around the breech tang, a cast or engraved side plate of steel, iron, brass, or silver, and a wrist plate of the same materials.
Wy1r4db.jpg

OpxZdk5.jpg

cmv0Ooe.jpg

WGtQT3Q.jpg


In most cases, the hardware was engraved. I chose to carve a rococo shell around the breech, and include a fine silver cast, chiseled, and engraved side plate, and wrist escutcheon that were appropriate for the time period.
p1GC9wV.jpg

1HPiYwv.jpg

8uCwHKg.jpg

hPIRFRn.jpg


I also restricted my engraving to line style rather than deep relief. I originally wanted to simulate the deep relief sculpting on the silver trigger guard and butt plate from an original fowler I own. However, in my research, it seems deep relief generally was reserved for silver hardware that was cast and I never examined a piece from my period mounted in iron or steel with anything but line engraving on the trigger guard and butt plate. I am sure exceptions can be found and there are examples of deeply sculpted iron and steel on earlier guns by makers such as James Paul Freeman and Andreas Dolep shown in Neal and Back's "Great British Gunmakers 1540-1740", but sculpted butt plates and trigger guards in steel or iron must have been rare during my period. Anyway, I chose to use line engraving and simulate relief by shading lines. I engraved a portrait of Adam Smith on my butt plate as a complement to the portrait of David Hume on my matching rifle. Adam Smith wrote "Wealth of Nations" which first described free markets and the use of individual self interest as a central motive upon which to build economies and structure society. He and Hume were the two leading lights of the "Scottish Enlightenment" during the 18th century. Basically, they took a lot of the abstract ideas expressed by the French "philosophes" and made them work in the real world. I also did extensive research on border styles thinking that there had to be a nice HC alternative to the "nick and dot". However, if the hardware was not cast in silver or brass and the border chiseled and sculpted, I could not find examples that did not have all main borders engraved with nicks and dots. I am sure there are examples but I found none in my collection of photos, books, or on guns I examined. Now please don't say I saw a Manton, Nock, Mortimer, etc gun with running leaves or scalloping on the borders. Those guns are not from the period I am considering. Consequently, I did so many nicks and dots that I saw them in my sleep. I suffer from "nick and dot" disease. I was so tired of N&D that I finally cut my favorite thick and thin borders around the frizzen and top jaw. There just had to be guns with thick and thin borders from the period other than Brown Bess muskets or at least that is the fantasy I tell myself to justify my decision.
QSFsKSR.jpg

IcHEW3S.jpg

sJ3ExgI.jpg


I was reluctant to engrave the lock plate extensively.As always, there are exceptions, but generally round-faced locks on good quality British guns appear not to have been heavily engraved. As flat-faced locks became the dominant fashion for better guns, extensively engraved plates seem to have become more common. I engraved my simple banner that was inspired by Benjamin and Joseph Griffin, and William Bailes.
vMLAxTd.jpg


The engraving on my fowler was inspired by the Griffins, Joseph Heylin, and William Bailes, and I also borrowed from John Schippers where his style was appropriate. I annealed the frizzen so I could engrave it and then case hardened and tempered it. I get sparkler sparks in the center of the pan every time I snap the lock.

In finishing the gun, I already described staining the stock with dyes. After the dye dried, I rubbed the stock back with a gray Scotch-Bright pad dipped in water. When dry, I painted the stock with a sealer made from a 50-50 mix of Sutherland-Welles Botanical polymerized tung oil and mineral spirits. I mopped it on and let the stock absorb it, then wiped off the excess. I let it dry in the sun for several hours and then overnight in the shop. Then I dabbed the stock with unthinned polymerized tung oil, rubbed it back with my palm, and wiped off any excess. It was so hot at times I had to add a little raw tung oil to slow down the drying so I could rub it in. It took about a week to build up the finish. I let it cure for a week and then rubbed it back with rottenstone dipped in raw linseed oil. Then a final coat of hand rubbed tung oil and I was done.

18pS7Et.jpg

ddgH0IP.jpg


I assembled the gun, turned down all the wood screw heads and hardened, tempered, and heat blued them. Likewise, I hardened and tempered blued the trigger, barrel keys, lock bolts, tang bolt, top jaw screw, frizzen screw, and feather spring screw. I will eventually pin the keys to the stock after shooting the gun a bit to make sure no adjustment needs to be made in the fit of the keys. Finally, I made a tapered hickory ramrod and turned down horn for the muzzle end of the rod and drilled and turned a 1/4" diameter mild steel rod for the other end. I will eventually make another rod with a worm attached but I initially wanted one for use with a modern cleaning jag. Well that is it. I have not shot the gun yet so I will report on how that goes in a few days. I will post once more with some concluding thoughts about building these guns. Thanks for your patience and all of the comments. I enjoyed doing this.

dave
 
Hi Dave,

I sure enjoyed reading why you did things the way you did on this fowler. It seems you created your own style from known things done in the period?

Would it be too much to say that a gunsmith working in your geographical area in the period, may have made such a piece for an affluent client as bespoke work or even a gun to treat himself and use as his "Master's Piece" to impress possible clients?

Gus
 
Hi Gus,
The fowler represents what I believe is work of the best quality done in London during the 1750s. As such, it would have been made by many different craftsmen. What might set this gun apart from many originals is that the gun and its decorative work were designed and done by one person with a clear vision about the end product. On the other hand, many originals show design dissonance in that it is clear that a single guiding hand was not in complete control. Some of the decorative work, despite being examples of extraordinary workmanship, just doesn't fit together whereas mine does. For example note how the side plate just fits the space for it perfectly like it was made for it, which it was. How many British and European guns from that time period have you seen on which a beautiful side plate was rudely fitted to the allotted space? Often on those guns you see the front of the plate is oddly and awkwardly extended so that it can be adapted to the lock bolt spacing. The person who made it was not working from the actual gun and probably never saw the finished product. I am not sure you could identify a unique style in my gun. The side plate is strongly inspired by the work of John Paul Freeman, the wrist plate is copied from Joseph Heylin, the wire inlay is inspired by French pattern books, the stock is typical of the time. What personal style I created, if any, is that I integrated the pieces into a pleasing whole that all works together. I have an eye for design and style, something I learned mostly from my late wife. It is a quality that many period gun makers, even some of the best, lacked. Most were great craftsmen but not designers or artists and that includes most American makers as well. My gun could represent a gunmakers masterpiece submission but it is also consistent with best quality work done for wealthy clients. I believe it represents an 8-10 guinea gun at a time when 5-6 guineas was the price for a 1st quality sporting gun. The extra cost comes from the Spanish barrel, decorative inlay work, superior wood, and steel mounts.

dave
 
Hi Dave,

Thank you for that informative explanation, I really enjoyed reading it.

Had you submitted that fowler to the London Gunsmith's Guild in 1750 as your Master's Piece, I'm sure you would have been accepted hands down.

Gus

P.S. As a matter of fact, it inspired me to look up more information on Ursus Christian Egg, i.e. Durs Egg whose descendent is in our family line, though she married my Great Great Grandfather's Brother and so I'm not a direct descendent.
 
Thanks Frank and Gus,
Gus, I did not submit it to a guild but it did win best of show at Dixon's this year. So I have a bunch of blue ribbons at least.

dave
 
Hi Dave, I have an English fowler on order from Barbie Chambers, she has told me that the walnut stock material is quite a long while in coming but she has 2 stocks in cherry which she says is original for these guns, she has an original in their shop which is cherry, I have asked her to put one aside for me. So, am I wrong to go with the cherry or should I wait for the walnut? I don't want to make a problem for her, she is a nice person.
 
Hi Hatman,
Barbie is the best and I love doing business with them. But I also just like talking to her, Jim, and her mother on the phone. They are the best people. Before trying to answer your question, what is your objective for the gun? Is it a historically accurate English fowler? Is it more a gun that might be used or made in colonial America? Or do you just want a slim birding gun? I need to know that before I can help.

dave
 
Hi Dave, I originally thought of a historically accurate English fowler for a bird gun but I'm not that much a "stickler" if there may be doubt as to the wood's originality. Barbie has a fowler that the kit is derived from and is in Cherry so that is fine with me, Cherry wood was exported to England so...!
I looked at the TRS site and saw that they have breeches that would fit a 16 ga. and I think I can cut the tang and make the hook on the bolster, when I get everything I'll try to take pictures.
Thank you Dave for all your help.
 
Back
Top