CrackStock, you apparently didn't consider my qualifier to the comment
I believe that you are agreeing with me that black powder firearms can be used effectively for self defense and do not realize it. Did I recommend black powder as a first line of defense? NO I did not, I simply stated that black powder arms can be used but they have drawbacks which modern firearms do not have.
If you are so dead set against using a black powder handgun why even recommend a particular antique model?
I believe the original question was asking about the use of a black powder handgun not a scattergun.
I'll post it again so you can reconsider what was really said and please don't quote out of context."Are black powder arms sufficient for self defense, Of course they are."
However; if you consider all the drawbacks that have been discussed and you truly want to provide adequate self defense for the family and self why depend on antiquated methods???
I believe that you are agreeing with me that black powder firearms can be used effectively for self defense and do not realize it. Did I recommend black powder as a first line of defense? NO I did not, I simply stated that black powder arms can be used but they have drawbacks which modern firearms do not have.
Granted a rock can be used for self defense as can an arrow, but so can a club (ball bat, golf club). Again I state why use an antiquated weaponHowever, I strongly disagree with the above listed statement. ...Rocks killed people before arrows which killed people before guns...
If you are so dead set against using a black powder handgun why even recommend a particular antique model?
However, in the event that one persists in using and cap and ball for some reason I would opt for the 1858 Remington as I prefer the top strap for strength and the stability of the rear sight being mounted on the frame. Besides, I just like the old 58 best.
I believe the original question was asking about the use of a black powder handgun not a scattergun.