Carrying Horn and Bag Together?

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Cans, are the same root as canteen. It could be a cup or tankard or a true canteen. It wasn’t until the middle nineteenth century that cans became cheap enough to give away as the container. Factory made cans were cheap compared to one at a time tinned or lead container.
 
tenngun said:
However without the romance a ml is just a smelly dirty slow to fire heavy smoke pole.
A silly thought, I know, but in case anyone is interested in the history instead of the romance or convenience, I believe separate big horns and smaller bags were more usual early on and smaller horns attached to larger bags came on later. F&I horns are pretty big. Most all the bags with horns attached seem to be 19th century.

Of course, documented bags from the 18th century are scarce as hen's teeth, so in discussions like this we are all doing a lot of guessing.

I do mid-18th century, so I lean to separate horns and bags. I do have a couple later types with horns attached, and I use them, but I don't like them, find them awkward to use.

Spence
 
When I deer hunt, I just use a small cylinder-style flask kept in my bag since the need for more than one shot has only occurred 1 time in 18 years.

However, when I small game hunt, I like to keep all the components outside my main bag for immediate access, so I have a horn attached to the bag strap...actually two.

Here's an overall picture:

39377551874_e3f77f2f10_k.jpg


My bag strap, on each side, has a series of holes so the length of the strap can be set for individual conditions (lots of clothes, etc) and I just use that structure to attach my horns.

I run the leather horn strap up through some of the lacing, and go around the bag strap and through a hole or two:

39377551304_acd2b8d0b1_k.jpg


Then on the back, just put a half-hitch in it.

26214570738_224054de7d_k.jpg


Have never had any issues with it coming loose or off. Yet, it can be removed in just a few seconds, if I want to.
 
I once found an old round "Dupont" black powder tin can in the cellar roof rafters of an old farm house I bought. The label said 1# of "shooting" powder. It had a small (1/2") threaded metal cap, was army green in color, and had a paper label attached. Date of manufacture was labeled as 1848. I wish I still had the can, but lost it when I sold the house and moved. There was still a few grans of powder in the bottom of the can that looked to be 3f in granulation size.
 
Spence10 said:
A silly thought, I know, but in case anyone is interested in the history instead of the romance or convenience, I believe separate big horns and smaller bags were more usual early on and smaller horns attached to larger bags came on later. F&I horns are pretty big. Most all the bags with horns attached seem to be 19th century.

Of course, documented bags from the 18th century are scarce as hen's teeth, so in discussions like this we are all doing a lot of guessing.

I do mid-18th century, so I lean to separate horns and bags. I do have a couple later types with horns attached, and I use them, but I don't like them, find them awkward to use.

Spence

Spence,

I found out the history is important not only to those doing a period impression or reenactors, but also to those who just shoot the guns.

I made my first pouch out of cowhide split leather, because I did not know better and there wasn’t much info on making authentic replica Shot/Hunting Pouches in 1972. When I added the horn to the strap, it doubled or trebled the problems of the soft pouch folding in on itself. So I made a separate cord to carry the horn.

My first trip to the Primitive Range at Friendship in the Spring of 1974 was a real eye opener for guns and especially for pouches and horns. With absolutely NO History to back it up and since many flintlock shooters used 4Fg powder in their priming pans and 2Fg or 3Fg in the barrels of the guns, they “reasoned” that people back in the day wore TWO powder horns (one for each powder granulation) and often on the straps of their pouches, though sometimes the smaller 4Fg horn was hung from their necks. Now there were some gorgeous “matching sets” of horns that were made in those days, but as bad as one horn is attached to a pouch strap, a second horn attached made it far worse.

OK, as I went with a combination of both 18th century Civilian Militia/Captain Willling’s Marine and Frontiersman; my next pouch had to do triple duty, as I could only afford enough leather for a single Shot Pouch. IOW, I had to be able to switch components to shoot my Brown Bess Carbine and Flintlock rifle in competition, plus be able to put a wood cartridge block in the pouch for military reenacting. So I made what looked like a Military over the shoulder Cartridge pouch, but had a removable wood cartridge block for it. Of course the Powder Horn was on a separate strap, because I did not use it when using blank cartridges. All these years later I have never found an original Shot Pouch/Cartridge Pouch exactly like it, but am still satisfied such a pouch was possible in the period and was made using period techniques and styling.

FWIW, there is plenty of documentation for the AWI and some for the FIW and post AWI periods that when Civilian Militia’s were called up for active duty or to fight hostile European Settlers or NA’s, that the separate strap powder horn was very important in those times for one guy to gather up the horns of others and get all the horns filled with as much powder as was rationed out, then return the horns to the owners. That was much simpler than taking each guy’s Pouch with an attached Horn to do the same thing

I have made or borrowed other horns/pouches over the years and used them, but even for percussion guns that only use one horn, I much prefer the horn on a separate strap. I can move the horn out of the way or get it closer to where I want it easily, to fill a measure. So count me in the “Separate Strap Powder Horn” group as well.
Gus
 
I seem to recall reading, many years ago, of frontiersmen being able to top off their powder supply at Inns.
 
I have no idea. Maybe just lash the two straps together. I have a lot of different bags and horns, one per gun.
Question, I find the horn bounces and slaps against a stiff leather bag- you can hear it. I have a few soft, brain tanned bags and the horn is quiet against it and the horn sort of depresses into the soft bag and doesn't swing around as much. Anyone notice the same thing?
 
Back to the original thought/question......

How about simply attaching your horn strap to your shooting bag strap with horn or wood buttons. Simple, functional, even elegant.....No charge for that advice :hatsoff:
 
Isiah said:
However, I haven't come up with a good way to easily attach horn to bag so it can be removed to use easily. Any of you folks do that and have suggestions?
Sew a tie (or poke a hole and thread through a thong) to each end of the strap (at your desire height) and tie the spout to one and the butt end to the other.
 
I only use one hunting pouch, with the horn attached high, so it doesn't interfere with the flap. The whole rig fits up under my arm, so it never shifts when *running* or bending down. It works so I stick with it.
I Did try a separate strap on a flask but it was always getting raffled up.

** Running was before my knees stiffened up and creak!

Artificer, Are you the bloke who makes nice sporrans on another channel?

Pukka.
 
While back I used to carry my horn on my bag that way. I would attach a couple of light weight leather straps (foot and a half rougly)to each end of my horn, figure about where you want your horn to ride on the bag.
Mark where you want to attach the smaller straps to your bag strap and make a small incision, slip the end of the smaller strap through and tie it on the back side.
Hope this helps. Gene
 
RJDH said:
Artificer, Are you the bloke who makes nice sporrans on another channel?

Pukka.

Sorry, no I am not. I have made exactly one Sporran in my life and that was for my own use in my Private Soldier Impression in the Major's Coy, 42nd Royal Highland Regiment, the Black Watch, for AWI reenacting.

Btw our Commanding Officer of the reenactment unit, the Major, was a retired Major and XO of the Canadian Black Watch. GREAT Guy!!

Gus
 
Spence10 said:
A silly thought, I know, but in case anyone is interested in the history instead of the romance or convenience, I believe separate big horns and smaller bags were more usual early on and smaller horns attached to larger bags came on later. F&I horns are pretty big. Most all the bags with horns attached seem to be 19th century.

Of course, documented bags from the 18th century are scarce as hen's teeth, so in discussions like this we are all doing a lot of guessing.

Wallace Gusler has found a number of inventory references from ~ Revolutionary-era Virginia that list (IIRC) "rifle, pouch, and mold", plus possibly some other gun-related equipment, but not powderhorns. He thinks that this might be an indication of horns attached to the straps and included in the "pouch" designation, which would explain why the horn would be omitted from an otherwise complete set of equipment.
 
Back
Top