"In a pistol, the bore diameter is smaller or equal to the bullet. When the bullet enters the pistol barrel, it is squeezed into the rifling, sans patch. The soft lead in a pistol barrel would quickly fill the rifling and get left behind as leading residue. Harder lead still leads the barrel, but to a lesser extent."
Being a moderator on a cast boolits site, I'll try to cover some of the thoughts presented here. First, for the quote above. To shoot a cast bullet in either rifle or pistol, the bullet must be .001-002 over bore diameter. And generally, in low pressure loads like pistols, softer lead generally leads less, to zero. In rifles, i shoot up to 1700 fps before anything special is needed to do to prevent leading. After the remidail treatment, 2800 fps has been my upper limit on accurate rifle loads.
The act of smelting down wheel weights, if done properly, removes all traces of lighter metals, such as steel.
The balls cast from ww's, will drop from the mold about.00015 larger than pure lead. No big deal.
To get more consistant weights when casting, run your pot op to around 775 degrees. You will have frosted bullets at this point, but the weight will be much more consistant, and the frost does nothing to accuracy or performance.
From our testing, we have found the obduration of even a pure lead ball to be negligable, to non-existant. Shoot some into a snowbank, and check for your self.
WW's for hunting give better penetration than pure lead, and still expand to create a good wound channel. I wouldn't use pure lino. The velocity of a round ball may not be a problem, but with a bottleneck cartridge, lino shot at over 2000 fps tends to shatter when it strikes game, making an inefficient metal to use for the purpose.