Basically, by the 1830s most of the artistry was gone.
You could fool me on that point.
Basically, by the 1830s most of the artistry was gone.
I don’t know that labor was cheap. Black slavery became a thing because too many whites left their indentured service via leg bail and could simply blend in where as blacks were easy to spot.There was a cry out for manpower all over the colonies and later the states
Why do we call them “Kentucky rifles”?Those names, colonial, Kentucky, Southern Mountain, late, early Ect are all make believe names. Makers made rifles, and adapted design to what the market wanted.
For instance, German rifles tended to have shorter barrels. Most of the men buying rifles in America were British French or Dutch. They seem to like longer barreled guns. So German American makers made longer barrels.
Colonial guns tended to look like German guns with longer barrels. After the revolution deer and smaller game became the rifles target. Smaller bores became common, so slimmer guns and common .
Styles became important just for looks. The French ‘calf’s foot’ design would show up on some Pennsylvania guns.
Germanic, Scandinavian and British descended folks in the old north west leaned to inlays that could serve a real purpose like protection around pin holes or no purpose like a silver heart behind the lock.
French and Celtic people in the south tended to plain, but flowing lines.
All of our names are just an artificial grouping of many guns made in an area at a time. Even though there were exceptions to the rule, and out of style guns would continue to be used and moved in to new areas.
Military companies that were armed with rifles were often called riflesWhy do we call them “Kentucky rifles”?
From what I’ve gathered, at the time everything west of Philadelphia was “Kentucky “
Sounds interesting; I've a Maine connection.This site talks about the evolving designs of longrifles over the years.
Early American Flintlock Longrifles: Part II of our American Longrifle Series - Scavengeology
I'm currently awaiting a copy of Maine Guns and Their Makers. It should be interesting.
There are several sources online. I think I got the only one Amazon itself had, but there are other sellers on Amazon that have it. Originally published in the 1970s, there's also an updated edition (which is what I got.) It was published by the Friends of the Maine State Museum, so it's not around in great quantity, and prices vary. I paid $50 for mine.Sounds interesting; I've a Maine connection.
Where did you get/find it? Thanks.
Sounds interesting; I've a Maine connection.
Where did you get/find it? Thanks.
I have read that the label “Kentucky Rifle” wasn’t coined until a couple of decades into the 19th century and was used generically to describe a flintlock rifle, likely one of the ornate, brass laden, carved samples which became popular at by the turn of the century. This label had no bearing on where it was actually produced, and still doesn’t.Why do we call them “Kentucky rifles”?
From what I’ve gathered, at the time everything west of Philadelphia was “Kentucky “
There's also the thought that "plain" working guns, the everyday hard-use guns, did not survive at a high rate; the fancy, prized, "glitzy" rifles would be more likely to have survived over the centuries. Thanks for your interesting comments.Hi,
The notion that plain guns dominated during the 18th century is not backed up by any evidence. Of course, it depends on your definition of plain. If you mean no carving, engraving, and very simple hardware, there is not much evidence they predominated. If you read the day book listings from the Moravian gun shop at Christian's Spring published by Bob Lienemann in his 2 volume history of Moravian gun making, you find that the shop was making guns with a spread of price ranges but none predominated. Many surviving Rev War period rifles are fairly plain but virtually all have some carving. They also show extensive use indicating they were not wall hangers. Many, if not most, surviving long rifles that were originally flintlocks were converted to percussion ignition. Even the most ornate. Many, if not most, of the surviving carved and decorated flintlock rifles that you see in the books were converted to percussion and later converted back to flint. There is no reason to convert a rifle to percussion if it was a wall hanger. Davy Crocket's purported first gun is a beautiful carved York County rifle. Decoration was common and the buyers could afford it. Finally, the notion that styles and "schools" are a modern invention is not accurate. Longrifle "schools" derived from important local makers that had distinct styles of architecture and decoration. They taught apprentices who carried on those styles sometimes changing and developing them after experiences as journeymen with gunsmiths outside the areas in which they apprenticed. However, the distinctions carried on through time and can be identified today by knowledgeable students of long rifles. The labels we now give them may be a later invention but those styles existed and were recognized at the time.
dave
They were the rifle one TOOK to Kentucky...made in Pa., taken into Kentucky with hunters & pioneers.I have read that the label “Kentucky Rifle” wasn’t coined until a couple of decades into the 19th century and was used generically to describe a flintlock rifle, likely one of the ornate, brass laden, carved samples which became popular at by the turn of the century. This label had no bearing on where it was actually produced, and still doesn’t.
Thanks for the lead.Try using the search engine "bookfinder.com"
Of course, there must have been many small, unsung, plain-Jane, workaday shops making common inexpensive rifles? The Moravian was kind of a high-quality shop, was it not, but there had to have been many small, (now unknown), makers cranking out utility guns. All such research as you mention is of great value to historians of these uniquely American-crafted pieces. Very interesting!Hi,
The notion that plain guns dominated during the 18th century is not backed up by any evidence. Of course, it depends on your definition of plain. If you mean no carving, engraving, and very simple hardware, there is not much evidence they predominated. If you read the day book listings from the Moravian gun shop at Christian's Spring published by Bob Lienemann in his 2 volume history of Moravian gun making, you find that the shop was making guns with a spread of price ranges but none predominated. Many surviving Rev War period rifles are fairly plain but virtually all have some carving. They also show extensive use indicating they were not wall hangers. Many, if not most, surviving long rifles that were originally flintlocks were converted to percussion ignition. Even the most ornate. Many, if not most, of the surviving carved and decorated flintlock rifles that you see in the books were converted to percussion and later converted back to flint. There is no reason to convert a rifle to percussion if it was a wall hanger. Davy Crocket's purported first gun is a beautiful carved York County rifle. Decoration was common and the buyers could afford it. Finally, the notion that styles and "schools" are a modern invention is not accurate. Longrifle "schools" derived from important local makers that had distinct styles of architecture and decoration. They taught apprentices who carried on those styles sometimes changing and developing them after experiences as journeymen with gunsmiths outside the areas in which they apprenticed. However, the distinctions carried on through time and can be identified today by knowledgeable students of long rifles. The labels we now give them may be a later invention but those styles existed and were recognized at the time.
dave
Why “of course”? Interested in some evidence.Of course, there must have been many small, unsung, plain-Jane, workaday shops making common inexpensive rifles? The Moravian was kind of a high-quality shop, was it not, but there had to have been many small, (now unknown), makers cranking out utility guns. All such research as you mention is of great value to historians of these uniquely American-crafted pieces. Very interesting!
Of course, there must have been many small, unsung, plain-Jane, workaday shops making common inexpensive rifles? The Moravian was kind of a high-quality shop, was it not, bu
t there had to have been many small, (now unknown), makers cranking out utility guns. All such research as you mention is of great value to historians of these uniquely American-crafted pieces. Very interesting!
Get a Kibler Colonial and put it together yourself... they’re so nice even I can do it.It sounds to me like just about every kind of long rifle was available during Daniel Boone’s day. What you had was simply what fit your taste and budget. I also found an interesting video on You Tube of the Gunsmith in Colonial Williamsburg. They made fairly plain rifles with some brass embellishments. It appears that whatever I purchase will be appropriate for the Colonial or Daniel Boone era.
Starman (Jack)