Good Evening All,
It has been a long time since my last post on the ML Forum, but thought this subject would be an interesting one to comment on.
I have been building and shooting muzzle loading rifles for 57 years and have some very strong opinions based on those years of experience.
I must respectfully disagree with Wick Ellerbe's statement that the muzzle does not have to be square to obtain a good crown. Birddog6 did a good job of illustrating the problem trying to crown a muzzle that is not square.
A properly squared muzzle with a concentric crown is absolutely essential to promoting the best accuracy from a muzzle loading rifle or a center-fire rifle. Of course, each person must determine their personal standard of acceptable accuracy.
As far as I am personally concerned, the best and most accurate way to square and crown the the muzzle of ANY rifle barrel is to use a lathe eqipped with an independent 4-jaw chuck. Even then certain protocols must followed.
Not only must the muzzle be centered in the chuck, but the breech must be centered. In my shop, a series of alumina collars are used. The O.D. is turned to fit snugly inside the spindle wth THE I.D. drilled then bored to closely fit around the corners of the barrel. These collars support and center the breech of the barrel at the back end of the lathe headstock spindle.
Without this centering, the breech will have a great deal of "run-out" even through the muzzle might be be perfectly centered in the chuck. This means the length of the barrel is not aligned to the center of the axis of the center of the lathe. The end result is that the muzzle wil not be perfectly squared after"facing".
When centering the muzzle prior to "facing", it is important to center the bore, not the flats of the barrel. A 60 degree angle centering bar is inserted into the muzzle. The opposite end of the centering bar is drill with a 60 degree combination center drill and is supported by a "dead center" in the the tail stock.
A dial indicator is set up to touch the the centering bar as close to the muzzle as possible. With the dial indicator, the bore can then be centered to a bare "wiggle" of the indicator needle.
At this point, the old crown is removed in a standard lathe facing operation. When all traces of the old crown are removed, the bore is centered a second time. Some "run-out" alwaysshows back up, because the first centering is indicated in on a faulty crown.
After the muzzle has been properly squared, the lathe compound is swiveled to 20 degrees. A small boring bar is used to turn a 20 degree crown in the muzzle bore. The crown is cut just deep enough to remove the sharp edges of the the botton of the rifling grooves.
It is very important to note that turning the crown in this manner absolutely dictates that the bore be perfectly centered to no more than 0.0005" run-out on the dial indicator. Otherwise, the crown will not be centered with the bore.
A brass lap with a 20\5 degree angle coated is used just briefly to to remove the sharp edge left by the boring tool.
All of this may seem like a lot of work, But I can square and crown a barrel in much less time than it took to explain and detail my method.
Is all of this work really worth the time and effort/ I can only quote the late Colonel Townsend Whelen, "Only accurate rifles are interesting" and "The proof of the pudding is in the shooting".
I have re-squared and re-crowned dozens if not a few hundred barrels of both center-fire and muzzle loading type over the years, usually after the owner has attempted to hand square and crown the muzzle. Every one of them has showed very significant improvement in the accuracy department.
I respect the opinions of all others on this subject, but there is no way a human being can hand square and hand crown a barrel as accurately as a good machinist can do the same job in a lathe.
For me the difference between hand crowning and my method is being satisfied to hit a coffee cup saucer at 50 yards or nailing a fifty cent piece at the same range shot after shot.
With the years of personal experience behind me, it is not a debatable subject.
I remain with all respect,
John L. Hinnant
"God and Texas"