I didn't say she joined "yesterday". Please read carefully.Roy said:She joined a month ago, not yesterday... I am a member on a lot of forums and only read them.
Since we don't know the facts, we can only guess at the truth from both sides. But, based on what has been posted (which we do know) I do not think this is "just about safety". I think the intent is to smear and discredit the builder, as the builder said he was told they would do. It appears that they have accomplished their goal. We have people saying that "those guns should never have been shipped" when we don;t know what condition they we when shipped.Roy said:Thats it!! They are all crooked! Bent to destroy :haha: :shake:
The buyers made the mistake(s) of not complaining and returning the merchandis immediately.
Grey Whiskers said:DoubleDeuce1 and Acorn Mush are friends of mine. They are two modest and trustworthy individuals.
That may be proof enough for some, but it's not facts.Roy said:Jack,
I trust a few people on this forum and this is one of them, what agenda would Lon have??
Grey Whiskers said:DoubleDeuce1 and Acorn Mush are friends of mine. They are two modest and trustworthy individuals.
54ball said:Drilled vents are starting to sound better and better, aren't they.
Jack Wilson said:Since we don't know the facts, we can only guess at the truth from both sides. But, based on what has been posted (which we do know) I do not think this is "just about safety". I think the intent is to smear and discredit the builder, as the builder said he was told they would do. It appears that they have accomplished their goal. We have people saying that "those guns should never have been shipped" when we don;t know what condition they we when shipped.Roy said:Thats it!! They are all crooked! Bent to destroy :haha: :shake:
People are smearing a gun builder without a shred of first hand knowledge. That's in itself is despicable.
According to the gun builder... "He followed this up by telling me essentially if I didn't accept his proposal, he would slander me on the many forums of which he is a member."charlie said:I have extreme difficulty understanding why anyone would mess around with an unacceptable item then air out all the dirty laundry on here.
Its still hearsay until proven otherwise.. :vJack Wilson said:According to the gun builder... "He followed this up by telling me essentially if I didn't accept his proposal, he would slander me on the many forums of which he is a member."charlie said:I have extreme difficulty understanding why anyone would mess around with an unacceptable item then air out all the dirty laundry on here.
flintlock62 said:Actually, slander is a punishable crime. We should all know this.
Agreed. As is everything that has been posted here so far, by both sides.Roy said:Its still hearsay until proven otherwise.. :vJack Wilson said:According to the gun builder... "He followed this up by telling me essentially if I didn't accept his proposal, he would slander me on the many forums of which he is a member."charlie said:I have extreme difficulty understanding why anyone would mess around with an unacceptable item then air out all the dirty laundry on here.
Not knowing when the photos were taken or how the damage happened, I can't comment on the photos.Roy said:Well except for the photos. It could be argued that the sabotaged there own guns.. but I doubt it.
Now some of you may be asking why am I spending this much time on this topic?? Because I had one customer ask me if I have seen it and 2 more call up and ask about the integrity of an installed touch hole liner.
Enter your email address to join: