Sam squanch
69 Cal.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2019
- Messages
- 3,244
- Reaction score
- 4,613
Then he should run for political office!
Pure fiction. There was another tale about how Quantrill's men could empty their revolvers into the mouth of a cannon while riding past at full gallop. Its fun to fantasize...The Harper's piece also told the story of how Hickok had pointed to a letter "O" that was "no bigger than a man's heart." Standing some 50 yards away from his subject, Hickok "without sighting his pistol and with his eye" rang off six shots, each of them hitting the direct center of the letter.
We can do, as well as already have done instinctive aiming. How many times have you thrown a ball or a rock and hit your target. There are no sights on ones arm or wrist. If you needed sights to hit your target all the time...professional baseball pitchers would be out of a job.After many sessions of trying use "sights" on my percussion revolvers I had to step back and think about it. In mid 1800's did they use sights or shoot instinctively? I was not there so I cannot say. Maybe there are books that I have not read that delve into the shooting/aiming process? I believe that in the heat of the moment, back then, most revolver shots were instinctive.
Much like archery I started instinctively, went to sights, then back to instinctive. The instinctive archery shooting process, for me, has proved to be the most fruitful, fun and rewarding.
So I went to shooting my revolver instinctively. Surprise, I can see where I am shooting, I can adapt and it's a heck of a lot more fun!
Which way to you shoot your revolver?
YESFront Sight?
As an archer and former horse owner, i love this picture…Pure fiction. There was another tale about how Quantrill's men could empty their revolvers into the mouth of a cannon while riding past at full gallop. Its fun to fantasize...
I miss it!
Definitely front sight for defensive shooting.
Listen to the words of Wyatt Earp and use your sights.
I think the revolver was primarily designed for point shooting as it was a close quarters weapon often used on horse back that pretty much nullifies rear/front sight line up. Still while point shooting the front sight certainly comes into play!After many sessions of trying use "sights" on my percussion revolvers I had to step back and think about it. In mid 1800's did they use sights or shoot instinctively? I was not there so I cannot say. Maybe there are books that I have not read that delve into the shooting/aiming process? I believe that in the heat of the moment, back then, most revolver shots were instinctive.
Much like archery I started instinctively, went to sights, then back to instinctive. The instinctive archery shooting process, for me, has proved to be the most fruitful, fun and rewarding.
So I went to shooting my revolver instinctively. Surprise, I can see where I am shooting, I can adapt and it's a heck of a lot more fun!
Which way to you shoot your revolver?
Then you would not mind holding the target for me - at 200 yards.....I think the revolver was primarily designed for point shooting as it was a close quarters weapon often used on horse back that pretty much nullifies rear/front sight line up. Still while point shooting the front sight certainly comes into play!
This pretty much explains why most sights on percussion revolvers were rather crude for precision/bullseye or long range work.
Honestly? I can instinctively shoot a bow..I can instinctively shoot a rifle,,Which way to you shoot your revolver?
(Off topic a bit) And it even works for swords. I apply this technique to fencing weapons …. close my eyes and extend the arm. The blade should be in line with my arm. If not, adjust the grip angle until it is.In my opinion, it is of central importance for point shooting how well the grip or stock is adapted to the shooter's anatomy. There is an old saying, especially in shotgun shooting, that the barrel shoots but the stock will hit.
Some pistols have been designed for point shooting. I got an original french model M1763/66 pistol that was used on horseback by dragoons.
I was extremely surprised at how well this pistol feels in the hand even though the stock only looks like a curved branch. If I aim at an object up to 10 yards away with my eyes closed and open my eyes, the barrel points exactly at the target.
View attachment 255152
On the other hand, with my english sporting flintlock pistol Parker of London I got to use the sights. Otherwise I would miss a barn door
The sights on most .44 pistols were regulated at ~75 yards. Take second to line up the sights, squeeze the trigger, and anyone who has conquered pistol fundamentals will be able to consistently hit the torso of human silhouette targets offhand. From a rest like a bench or a fence post most full-size .44s will make 6in groups or better, and I've seen a few folks who get under 3in with a tuned gun and a disciplined reloading method.After many sessions of trying use "sights" on my percussion revolvers I had to step back and think about it. In mid 1800's did they use sights or shoot instinctively? I was not there so I cannot say. Maybe there are books that I have not read that delve into the shooting/aiming process? I believe that in the heat of the moment, back then, most revolver shots were instinctive.
Much like archery I started instinctively, went to sights, then back to instinctive. The instinctive archery shooting process, for me, has proved to be the most fruitful, fun and rewarding.
So I went to shooting my revolver instinctively. Surprise, I can see where I am shooting, I can adapt and it's a heck of a lot more fun!
Which way to you shoot your revolver?
Enter your email address to join: