I don't know Brit, they both seem to be between ffff and fff in granule size, but comparing our pictures on the screen may be deceiving. I just don't know for sure. Where is that powder manufactured?
Robby
Robby
I don't know where it is made Robby.I don't know Brit, they both seem to be between ffff and fff in granule size, but comparing our pictures on the screen may be deceiving. I just don't know for sure. Where is that powder manufactured?
Robby
what some folks fail to grasp Brittsoothy, is that even as pressure builds in a barrel the safety valve is opening. the powder forward of the burning column and the shot/patch/ball are moving forward, thereby increasing the space for the pressure spike. many tests have been done with bp, on film if one chooses to search for and watch them. catastrophic damage is only encountered when the infamous air gap or propellent of a foreign nature is introduced . i have a couple unused barrels lying about. maybe i will use a friends strain gauge and do some testing. right after i get done killing a buck, a boar, and a bull. then there are all the ducks and geese waking me from my slumbering. there is also some room in the freezer for a few more grouse.
yeah, i will get right on testing ffffg for destruction.
the only reason i don't use ffffg is i only have one can of it. most of my fines are null b or just plain old fluffy powder. it alm
If those small piles were actually thrown by equal volume it would be indicative of why it could be hazardous, if shown by actual weight it would illustrate the quantity of the charge.Brit, I remember some time ago you posted a picture of what you call ffff and to me it looked more like fff, not that it matters. I have experimented with ffff as a main charge in small caliber's like .32 and .36 and found accuracy to be wanting, but never feared blowing anything up.
I don't know why this print is coming out in bold type. HaH! must have hit something by mistake!
Here is a picture of the three most used Goex powders. All the best,
View attachment 164979
Robby
This is how it starts.it would be indicative of why it could be hazardous,
Wasn’t a suggestion. Just an observation of the hazards of using measurements of grains by volume and weight. I think it’s been proven that in long barrel black powder guns it would be difficult to use enough powder, unless done so deliberately, to actually blow a gun apart using black powder. In several YouTube videos about all that happened was ruined stocks from excessive recoil on a rifle that was secured amd fired remotely. Seems it only becomes a bomb if both ends are securely plugged. Loaded properly excessive powder only turned into smoke, soot, flame and perhaps unburned powder.This is how it starts.
Suggestions with no evidence.
I have used equal volumes and still have both hands and eyes.
It is not dangerous or they would not make it!
There is always the (x) factor and murphy's law to contend with. Only a fool purposely tries to overload a muzzleloader. IMHOWasn’t a suggestion. Just an observation of the hazards of using measurements of grains by volume and weight. I think it’s been proven that in long barrel black powder guns it would be difficult to use enough powder, unless done so deliberately, to actually blow a gun apart using black powder. In several YouTube videos about all that happened was ruined stocks from excessive recoil on a rifle that was secured amd fired remotely. Seems it only becomes a bomb if both ends are securely plugged. Loaded properly excessive powder only turned into smoke, soot, flame and perhaps unburned powder.
I agree. I only shoot revolvers and occasionally pistols. Revolvers are limited by how much one can fill the chamber and still seat the ball below flush and allow the cylinder to turn. Filling a Walkers chamber with 4F would, I assume produce a spectacular gout of flame from both muzzel and cylinder gap but not much else in terms of velocity or accuracy.There is always the (x) factor and murphy's law to contend with. Only a fool purposely tries to overload a muzzleloader. IMHO
Please test and report back, much better than assuming. You might be impressed and reveal to yourself what Mr Walker already knew! That's me assuming there.I assume produce a spectacular gout of flame from both muzzel and cylinder gap but not much else in terms of velocity or accuracy
Would seem I’ve irked you Mr Britsmoothy. My apologies if so, certainly wasn’t intentional.Please test and report back, much better than assuming. You might be impressed and reveal to yourself what Mr Walker already knew! That's me assuming there.
Not at all buddy.Would seem I’ve irked you Mr Britsmoothy. My apologies if so, certainly wasn’t intentional.
Assume is just a figure of speech.
What everybody knows is always different then what anyone can prove.Not at all buddy.
This whole thing is based on assumption and that is my point.
In all the years of asking and reading I have found zero evidence that 4 f will destroy a firearm .
I'll take your word on the lead dipping.What everybody knows is always different then what anyone can prove.
I have to say, that I know you shooting safely, I know I could imitate you with out difficulty. But….
I also know that if I had 4f I would feel uncomfortable about dropping a charge down the bore, and after the fist shot would go ‘whew, well that didn’t kill me’
If you dip your fingers in water, and get them good and wet, you can dip them in to a pot of molten lead and not get burned.
But knowing that I would be scared to try it
Fears and facts aren’t always reasonable.
And this will remain for the time being an intellectual exercise as I don’t need to restock right now and have never owned a pound of 4
Not going to try itI'll take your word on the lead dipping.
But if you do try it be sure to video it, for documentation purposes of course.
Crazy fools, don't they know lead is TOXIC!
Enter your email address to join: