That is a good point. For a modern person looking back, its probably fair to define it as something along the lines of "self igniting and shot with one hand". It is all vague though because pistols frequently had 20+ inch barrels (which you alluded to) and grips that could be used as cheek stocks.What’s a pistol?
Sounds smart but met seriously. Many of the first hand cannons had very short barrels and short stocks ( tillers) while some were long. While some early pistols were carbine length.
It’s a yellow/green question in early guns.
The first pistols were wheellocks. There are matchlock pistols in Japan and India, but no evidence they existed in Europe.I'm reading this book "20 Years After", by Alexandre Dumas. It is his follow up to "The Three Musketeers" and takes place in the 1400's but refers to the musketeers having pistols in holsters over the pommel of their saddle. I was pretty sure such things didn't exist at that time but just wanted to make sure. I think the Flintlock wasn't invented until the early 1600's and without that lock, it seems a pistol would be impossible.
It happens. It was a valid question because it was written 200 years after its subject period and the 1800s weren't exactly a high point for vigorous historical research.SORRY, I re-read the thing and realized my time frame was off.
Enter your email address to join: