Filler In Reduced Loads

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Walkabout

40 Cal
Joined
Apr 12, 2022
Messages
407
Reaction score
321
I have an 1858 brass frame, what is the consensus on using filler like Cream Of Wheat to fill the chambers? Does it actually improve accuracy? Thanks
 
I have an 1858 brass frame, what is the consensus on using filler like Cream Of Wheat to fill the chambers? Does it actually improve accuracy? Thanks
I've competed with reduced loads and cream of wheat filler and they were plenty accurate but full throttle loads were just as accurate as far as I could tell from scores fired. Cream of wheat is a good filler because it is dry and does not "sponge compress" or have oil in it like corn meal does. Never tried Grex or wad stacks for filler.
 
I think every gun is different and you have to find out what works best in your firearm. I have found in my ROA that a reduced load with a cream of wheat filler gives the most accuracy. I like using lubed wads or grease cookies to keep the fouling soft. It may not be historically accurate, but the older I get, the more I want things that make it easier.
 
Most N-SSA competition shooters use some kind of filler to bring the ball up to flush with the cylinder face. The logic is that if you seat the ball deeply then the ball has the opportunity to build up velocity before hitting the rifling, and may strip on the rifling.

I one time did a ladder load workup with and without filler, and the groups with filler were better than the groups without. But this was just one single ladder test of 6 shots per charge group and may not have been statistically significant.
 
I've never understood the logic of using an inert filler without an interposing wad. There is no controlling the uneven intermixing of powder and filler except hoping that powder stays put under handling and recoil.
In a revolver, at least in competition where the gun is going to be shot immediately after loading, when you drive the ball down onto the filler it compresses everything and there is not going to be any appreciable mixing.

For fun I put a cardboard disk in between the powder and filler and could not tell any difference.

In my Sharps, per the instructions of Charlie Hahn (who makes the cardboard tubes for the Sharps) I would put in the powder and then glue a cardboard disk over the powder, leaving an air gap between the charge and the bullet. The Sharps receiver is massive and has no problem with this. But I switched to using an unlubricated fiber wad of the correct diameter and thickness as it is much faster than gluing in a bulkhead into each tube. Just dump in the powder and poke in the wad. Then glue in the bullet.
 
I tend to load and shoot so I don't put anything between the powder and filler. I prefer to put the wad on top of the filler. I use a cylinder press and I press the wad down on the filler and the powder. I may or may not load a 'grease cookie' on top of the wad and than seat the ball. Have not seen a difference in impact that would suggest the filler is mixing with the powder. I use only black powder, no substitutes.
 
What are these "cookies " you speak of?
I use a 'cookie' that is approximately 1/8" thick that I cut out of a lamb tallow beeswax mixture. I will load powder, filler, unlubed felt wad, grease cookie and than the round ball. I am going to try this with paper cartridges as the cookie shouldn't mix with the powder as the wad will act as a barrier.
 


Write your reply...
Back
Top