Nope, didn't exist at that time.Did the young Daniel Boone start with a percussion gun before learning to shoot a flintlock?
Not trying to be a smart aleck, just throwing out a question.
Nope, didn't exist at that time.Did the young Daniel Boone start with a percussion gun before learning to shoot a flintlock?
Not trying to be a smart aleck, just throwing out a question.
There are poor quality percussion locks, too. I recall a Bedford county rifle I had about 50 years ago with a Russ Hamm lock that was not dependable, and at that time I didn't know how to fix it.When I compare the two types of ignition systems, I always refer to the flint lock as being the art of traditional muzzleloading. The percussion lock is the triumph of technology to make an easier to manufacture and more reliable ignition system.
A percussion lock can be reliable as it comes from the factory. I have not come across any flint lock that doesn't benefit from tuning the lock for smooth functioning. This is as simple as smoothing all the burrs off the rubbing parts or as complex as smoothing the mating parts and balancing the springs to flattening the pan cover of the frizzen to the pan and adjusting the cock for a better scraping strike angle on the frizzen face. Getting one's flint lock properly tuned is one of the reasons that a percussion lock system is often better for beginning the traditional muzzleloading experience.
The young Daniel Boone and everyone else of his time used the best technology available, just as the soldiers storming the beaches at Normandy carried Garands and not M16s. That was what I was alluding to in my post when I said I had always heard way back when I started it was easier to learn the percussion system because it was supposed to be an improvement over the flint system, hence the flint being referred to as "advanced" not in terms of evolution of the system but in the evolution of the new muzzle loading enthusiast. I don't mean to be bashing you but the new shooter today has options Daniel Boone did not.Did the young Daniel Boone start with a percussion gun before learning to shoot a flintlock?
Not trying to be a smart aleck, just throwing out a question.
Depends on your patience and persistence levels. Need more of both to start out with flint. The percussion cap makes it a bunch simpler.Hi guys, I'm finally getting round to buying my first muzzle loader after toying with the idea for a couple of years. (Going with a reproduction from Pedersoli).
I've decided on a smoothbore for the versatility but not sure if I want to go flint or percussion.
What are the pros and cons of each and is one more beginner friendly than the other?
I'll be taking the gun hunting for birds and deer and will also be using it for target shooting if you'd like to know.
From Pedersoli's catalogue I'll likely decide on one of these (Still open to suggestions though):
- Indian Trade Gun
- Brown Bess
- Carabinieri 1814
-1816 Harpers Ferry (Colt Conversion)
If anyone has some advice that might help my decision that would be great.
Cheers.
Start with a flint.
MUCH funner to shoot. Flints are abundant. Caps are nonexistant. No challenge or reward in the craplocks.
The young Daniel Boone and everyone else of his time used the best technology available, just as the soldiers storming the beaches at Normandy carried Garands and not M16s. That was what I was alluding to in my post when I said I had always heard way back when I started it was easier to learn the percussion system because it was supposed to be an improvement over the flint system, hence the flint being referred to as "advanced" not in terms of evolution of the system but in the evolution of the new muzzle loading enthusiast. I don't mean to be bashing you but the new shooter today has options Daniel Boone did not.
Round the world there are far more percussion guns than flint, as it is more modern and ignition is less of a problem, largely due to their ability to use substitutes like Pyrodex, which are all that is available in some places. In remote places where caps and substitute powders are at a premium, then flints rule.I'm not totally sure what most NZ shooters prefer but from what I've seen percussion seems to be more popular.
I own a lee enfield no.4 which I've been using for around half a year and I've also done quite a bit of shooting in the past with a 5 millimeter rifle and a double barrel shotgun.
Yeah I have checked and there seems to be an adequate supply of caps here.As said above .. If New Zealand is anything like the US in shooting supply frequency I would see what supplies are available on a fairly routine basis. Then stock up on them then get the gun. It sucks to have a new gun and not be able to get needed items to shoot it
From a self sufficiency perspective its actually easier to make percussion caps in NZ because as far as I know there is no naturally occurring flint in the country. It all had to be imported from England originally.Yes, as a practical matter the supply issue would dictate my choice.
If caps are spotty then Flintlock, as you won't need them
If real black powder is short, then caplock if caps are around, as a flintlock will not work with substitutes for holy black.
If neither is available or both can be cut off, then the flintlock is the obvious choice as given simple and usually readily available or makeable Sulphur, saltpeter and charcoal, you can make your own powder if legal to do so there. Making caps is a bit more problematic.
Flintlock would be my personal first choice as it possesses a more "self-sufficient" feel and is historically linked and romanticized with the creation of my country.
Either requires some adaptations from cartridge guns, but one is no more difficult to master than the other, given quality locks, and you should be fine with Pedersoli in that aspect.
Round the world there are far more percussion guns than flint, as it is more modern and ignition is less of a problem, largely due to their ability to use substitutes like Pyrodex, which are all that is available in some places. In remote places where caps and substitute powders are at a premium, then flints rule.
I have a couple of Lee Enfields myself and have found them an accurate and interesting rifle, especially in their historic significance.
Enter your email address to join: