As for the NRA, of course they are a strong voice, but they do not have the expertise and commitment in the black powder arena that the NMLRA does. There are several good organizations out there that have their finger on the pulse of muzzleloading, but only one of them tries to do so much with so little: the NMLRA. It deserves the support of everyone who is serious about muzzleloading.
To set the record straight, membership is not $60 as someone said earlier; annual membership with a printed magazine is $50, but if you want to save some money you can sign up for the digital version of Muzzle Blasts.
Why does the NMLRA deserve the support of anyone, when in so many cases they have deliberately excluded so many people, and antagonized so many more? That's a serious question, and if you want the membership to grow, that is the question that needs to be answered. It isn't being answered by gaslighting from the "Friendship Mafia" and their friends, or the brainwashed parroting the party line. Substantive answers to why anyone should support an organization are part of what is necessary if the organization is going to survive, let alone thrive.
Oh, and by the way Mr. Bye, my membership last year cost $85: the $50 I sent in for a membership and magazine (check was cashed, but no membership etc was received--not for the first time) and the $35 I sent in later for a membership and online magazine.
The NMLRA does what it can to support muzzloading. The reason the organization reached out to the inline people was an effort to increase the membership with hopes that once they were exposed to what muzzleloading has to offer, that they would diversify their interest in the sport.
How's that working out? As I recall, the organization has lost half the members since they started promoting inlines. (It probably wasn't helped by an editor who told folks that if they didn't like all the inline coverage and ads they should leave. . . .)
I hate to admit, if it was not for going to Friendship to shoot, I would have quit a long time ago. I enjoy visiting with the friends on the pistol line I have made over the years.
So why should someone who is not going to go to Friendship join? That question gets asked over and over, we always get the same answers, but they don't really answer the question.
NMLRA is awesome, I line about an 1.5 hr away and enjoy the grounds, enjoy the shoots and enjoy having BP to buy. They put on some great classes and I have met some great people there. Like with every group someone is going to be unhappy, but for me it’s a tremendous asset.
Mr. Cooper, I'm happy for you. I'm glad you have a (reasonably close) range where you can enjoy the grounds and participate in the matches, and the classes, and just enjoy being a member. But why--other than to subsidize the fun of people like you, who do derive that benefit--should anyone who can't or won't go there be a member?
With the frequent bashing of the NMLRA, would you post here if you were the President of the NMLRA?
As an NMLRA member (well, they got my money again, don't know if I'm going to get membership or get ripped off again, but for now I'll assume I'm a member) I expect the officers--people who have sought to govern the organization and represent the membership--to take an active role recruiting on what is perhaps the most-effective recruitment opportunity available, even if it is uncomfortable. If the officers aren't doing that, well, it sorta suggests they don't want to do their job.
Snapper has admitted to being an NMLRA officer and participates here, and from time to time even tries to answer questions from the unwashed and uncouth folks like me who are perpetually perturbed with the Friendship Mafia.
A little food for thought for the folks spouting the "when the NMLRA dies, the sport will die" nonsense. I went to a shoot last fall. I don't know if the match was advertised or if it was just word-of-mouth, but I never saw an ad. Of the >70 registered adult shooters, the average age was just over 31; we also had almost 50 registered juniors. If everyone told the truth on the entry form, there were 6 NMLRA members competing, with an average age of >66 (ha! I was the
youngest!).