Just one mans opinion. I am not a fan of "trophy" hunting, killing just to kill, to satisfy your ego.
"Trophy" hunting does not have to be "killing just to kill." Hunters seeking out older more mature animals are still consuming and using the animals just like other hunters. They are also going home empty handed much more often, so actually killing far less!
I see you donated your deer. Good for you. How is this different from a "trophy hunter" in Africa feeding a local village with the kills and taking home the memories?
I do not particularly like bows for hunting because they do not kill quickly, cleanly, because many hunters take shots they shouldn't take.
Have been a bowhunter for 50 years. I can attest to the massive and very quickly fatal killing power of broadhead tipped arrows.
The flaws in your mostly animal-rightist rhetoric is you blame a weapon choice, a hunting method choice, etc. and decide for others that they must do as you do, or did, or they are not worthy.
Bad shots are bad shots, regardless of the weapon. Can you show me your hard evidence vs your rumor and innuendo on wounding rates (as spread by PETA and HSUS) for various weapon types? That people shooting certain types of weapons are inherently more careful?
I may not personally choose a certain weapon or hunting style, but if it is legal and done with good ethics, then I'm not going to condemn the hunter who does it.