But did anyone in history ever actually carry two percussion revolvers on their belt? I know cavalry carried two pistol but in saddle holsters. I imagine a Navy or Army sized pistol would be the best choice. I can see the benefits in the percussion era as reloads were extremely slow even using paper cartridges. I just haven’t been able to find many historical examples that this was every actually done in primary documentation and it seems like more of a modern movie Western trope at this point.
@Smokey Plainsman ,
The short answer is "yes."
This is John C. Cremony (1815-1879). He served with the 2nd Regiment, California Volunteer Cavalry, and may be best known for his book,
Life Among the Apaches.
He was a real frontiersman, and the book is a fascinating read, as well as primary documentation. This is from page 23:
Note the date of 1850 in the first sentence, and at the bottom of the page reference to "...
two belt and two holster six-shooters..." He refers to them again on page 65, as "...
my four six-shooters, two of which were in my belt, and two in my holsters":
Captain Randolph Marcy, in his equally interesting and probably better known book,
The Prairie Traveler (published in 1859), also mentioned revolvers in the belt (page 165):
He did say "pistols," but the general discussion on that and the preceding and subsequent pages made it clear he was discussing revolvers.
Another reference is from James F. Meline's
Two Thousand Miles on Horseback: Kansas to Santa Fe in 1866 (p.14), where he described "...
a hard-looking customer, on a California saddle, with a pair of pistols in his belt."
So, there is plenty of documentation of early frontiersmen carrying two percussion revolvers in the belt. In Cremony's case, he distinguishes the six-shooters in the belt from the two in holsters. This infers, to me, that in the 1850's "holsters" probably meant pommel holsters, carried on the saddle. Pistols "in the belt" were probably quite literally stuck in the belt at that time. In Rattenbury's
Packing Iron: Gunleather of the Frontier West, we find that the Colt 1851 Navy revolver was adopted by the US military for mounted troops in 1855, and "Writing in 1856, George B. McClellan, then a captain with the First US Cavalry and recently an observer of the Crimean War, remarked, '
For my own regiment, armed with revolvers, there need be no [pommel]
holster, for the men should follow the Russian system and always carry the pistol on the waist belt.'" (p.18). Subsequently, the American military began developing holsters for the belt, although I believe the cavalrymen of that time only carried one revolver. Regarding holsters for civilian use, I guess more research is needed. That famous photograph of Bill Hickok, shown above, appears to show the revolvers just stuck in his belt. Who is to say, though, if that was his customary mode of carry, at that relatively late date, or if it was just for the photo.
Something was said about cylinder-swapping for fast reloads. Cremony described
reloading his revolver during a fire-fight, after he had emptied out all of his guns:
However, in
Commerce of the Prairies, describing events between 1831 and 1839, Josiah Gregg made this intriguing statement:
He and his brother each had two revolvers and a repeating (revolving) rifle, but they each had "
...thirty-six ready-loaded shots apiece." I don't see how they could manage that unless they had spare, pre-loaded cylinders. The rifle must have been the Colt Paterson M1838 Ring-Lever Rifle:
It is my understanding that the Paterson revolvers (handguns) were five-shooters, but the first model of this revolving ring-lever rifle held eight rounds. So the math adds up correctly, two five-shot revolvers plus one eight-shot revolving rifle = eighteen shots. Spare, loaded cylinders for all three would bring the total to 36.
So, we do have ample documentation of people on the frontier carrying two percussion revolvers on the belt. We don't know when they started carrying them in belt holsters, though, as opposed to just being stuck under the belt or sash, and I haven't found any statement that explicitly described "cylinder swapping," although Josiah Gregg's account implies it.
Best regards,
Notchy Bob