• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

How many....

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I use an unlubed over powder wad when I shoot PA Connicals in my TC WMC. Can't say for sure it makes a huge difference in that rifle as it really shoots those well.
 
You will find many recurring threads that talk of using a wad or folded patch between powder and ball. Especially when using a thin path around the ball to minimize gas cutting. Also useful for those who don't wipe the bore between shots to push fouling out of the grooves and leave it between the powder charge and the patched ball. There are cases where accuracy is improved or that more shots can be fired before wiping the bore to remove fouling.
 
Using a dry, over powder patch or felt wad, etc, is a practice to protect the prb patch from getting burn holes. If your fired patches are in good shape with no holes burned through then you don't need an op patch/wad.

I've done this extensively trying felt/leather/wasp nest/toilet paper/tow and more. All appeared to work well in protecting the patch. Some shooters use wadding to prevent contaminating the powder with lube. Sometimes there is a slight improvement in accuracy but not always. Velocity often shows an increase in FPS and very frequently the loads are more consistent. By that I mean the velocity spread is less with a lower sd.

If patches are not burned an op wad is probably not needed. But on the other hand I've never seen an instance where it caused any problem either.
 
Back
Top