• Friends, our 2nd Amendment rights are always under attack and the NRA has been a constant for decades in helping fight that fight.

    We have partnered with the NRA to offer you a discount on membership and Muzzleloading Forum gets a small percentage too of each membership, so you are supporting both the NRA and us.

    Use this link to sign up please; https://membership.nra.org/recruiters/join/XR045103

I have a conflict in information and would like an opinion

Muzzleloading Forum

Help Support Muzzleloading Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Paul
Aftr 6 years in the Mule Deer range I have some thoughts on why we see so few reports on this venue about Mule Deer harvests.
1. We are a traditional forum. Most local western ML hunters use inlines here in Idaho. These hunters just want another season and thus do not participate in our forum.
I have instituted a traditional ML program over the last year at our local 450+ member rod and gun club and draw 5 to 15 shooters at monthly ML shoots. I believe the interest in traditional muzzleloading is just not here.
2. Out of state Hunters I think generally come to the Golden West to hunt the Waptiti-Elk. It is several hundred dollars more to add on a Mule Deer tag for out-of-state hunters primarily in the West for Elk.
3. I believe Mule Deer are viewed as an "added"
opportunity for harvest by most local traditional ML hunters in the West. A harvest that may be coincidental on and Elk hunt. Mule deer are not thought of as worthy of note as a ML Elk harvest.

Just some thoughts on a question that has come up on my scope also.
 
Cooner54 said:
paulvallandigham said:
While whitetails are occasionally caught out in an open field, usually crossing it to get from day beds, to feeding areas, or from feeding areas to night beds, they are, as a species, generally found in edge brush, on which they feed, and use as cover. They are not Antelope, a member of the goat family, that prefers open prairie, where its fine vision can protect it from predators, or Mule Deer, that are comfortable in more open area, while tending to sleep on hill(mountain) sides in the day to catch the sun's heat. I think the wide range of membership also includes a wide range of terrain that is hunted, and animals hunted. All deer are not the same. While the areas west of the Mississippi River are more open, and less wooded, you still find the Whitetails living along the wooded areas in the river bottoms.

I live in a largely Row-crop Agricultural county, with vast stretches where you see no trees or fences, or brushlines at all. The deer move out into those open areas only during the summer months when the corn is tall, and good "eats". When harvesting begins, the deer move back to the woods and treelines. Some deer have some bad habits on where they walk after the corn is harvested, and its those that are taken by first archers, and then gunners. The wise old boys learned long before to stay in the thick stuff, feed in the open only at the edges, and only at night, and to move into heavy cover long before there is enough light for hunters( predators to see them.) I have seen large bucks laying down in swales that were not deep enough for most hunters to believe a rabbit could be found in them. The old boys learn to stay put and let hunters walk right past them. Its the does and yearlings that get skiddish, and bust out of cover at the sight of a human, while the old guys stay and watch. I don't see this characteristic behavior changing much as you move into Iowa, or Kansas, and Nebraska, all states with record book Whitetails.

I find it interesting that we hear so few reports on this forum of successful Mule Deer hunters. You would think the numbers would be on the same order as Elk successes. :hmm:

Are you drunk or just working on it? :rotf: :rotf:

I think somewhere someone has missed the point of my humor. That's O.K.!! My point is: what does the thesis by Mr. P.V.; Esquire have to do with the question as stated at the top of this thread? The question is one of max loads and the thesis is about deer habits in various terrains and seasons. I wish we could stay on topic. No argument needed. Just expressing my 2 cents!!!
Cheerio and Adois, :hatsoff:
Cooner
 
Grey Hawk said:
I have a .50 GPR

In the Maximum Loading portion of the Lyman Handbook that came with my rifle. The Max for a .50 Caliber (they use .495 or can sub .490) is 110 grains 2f
In the Lyman Blackpowder Handbook and Loading Manual they say .490 can go up to 120 grains of 2f.

I know it's only 10 grains difference, but 10gr IS 10gr.

In this case which book is better to use or regardless stick with the lower.

Or call the Lyman CS office on Monday?

Grey Hawk

What charge does the gun shoot best? Have you looked at the velocity gain from 110 to 120 in a short barreled 50? Its probably not much.
Most rifles in 50 caliber will shoot best with 75 to 100 grains off FFG or FFFG powder.
I would shoot 75-80 grains of Swiss FFFG and get better velocity than the FFG loads. But thats just me and it depends on the barrels preference. If you want more velocity from the gun use Swiss powder. It will produce 100-150 fps over Goex in the same charge weight and granulation.
But once past about 1800 fps velocity gains are meaningless really.
Lyman is being practical. At 100 grains of FFG you are already past the point of diminishing returns. So *unless* the rifle shoots best with powder charges much over 90gr you are just wasting powder. RB rifles need only be loaded to give a velocity that will produce a flat trajectory, with in 2.5/3" of line of sight to 110-120 yards (this is usually on or 1" high at 100). This gives best results for most shooting and allows the shooter to find where he needed to hold for 25 and 50 yards if shooting scoring ring targets.
Finding the best load requires testing powder charge weights, powder granulations (FF or FFF) patch thickness and different lubes on the patch.
Generally speaking 80-90 grains of FFFG a heavy patch and a .490-.495 ball will give good results. I have never shot FFFG in a 50 and I have had 4 and still have two but one has only been shot enough to adjust the sights.

I would also point out that for *maximum* accuracy at longer ranges it is often necessary to wipe between shots at least a damp patch to clean the lands. If you very water based lubes are used with a lot on the patch this may be avoided. But these are only good for match shooting since that can lead to bore corrosion if left in the bore for more than the time it takes to load and shoot.

Dan
 
One more thing if you are thinking hunting the increase in killing power between 90 and 110 grains of powder will be near zero any distance.
Shots past about 110 yards should not be taken at game with most RB rifles. Its doable but the shooter needs to be very good and KNOW the range and where the ball is going to go since past 120 even with optimal trajectory and velocity the drop from line of sight is very rapid.
Also past 100 yards (especially) even a 5-10 MPH wind causes a lot of problems with shot placement.

Dan
 
Talking about loads is like the three young boys sitting out front of the pool hall drinking beer and talking about guns. The first one says he alwasy uses 50 grains in his 50 cal. The next one says 100 grains is the only way to go. The third one not to be out done says anyone using less than 150 grains must be a girly person. They would have gotten into a fight over it had they not had to go back inside for more beer. So who was right? Well I've seen good groups shot with all those loads. If there is lots of smoke and fire out the front, and kicks like hell at the rear must be a hell of a killer! And the bottom line is use what your gun likes as long as it is up to the task you ask of it. :rotf:
 
1. We are a traditional forum. Most local western ML hunters use inlines here in Idaho. These hunters just want another season and thus do not participate in our forum.
I have instituted a traditional ML program over the last year at our local 450+ member rod and gun club and draw 5 to 15 shooters at monthly ML shoots. I believe the interest in traditional muzzleloading is just not here.
2. Out of state Hunters I think generally come to the Golden West to hunt the Waptiti-Elk. It is several hundred dollars more to add on a Mule Deer tag for out-of-state hunters primarily in the West for Elk.
3. I believe Mule Deer are viewed as an "added"
opportunity for harvest by most local traditional ML hunters in the West. A harvest that may be coincidental on and Elk hunt. Mule deer are not thought of as worthy of note as a ML Elk harvest.

All that holds true in Colorado as well. Even though we some of the more traditional ml regs in the country. Not the most trad but somewhere in the top 10.

Another factor is the question of how many hunters and how many tags are allowed. I think there are more hunters east of the miss and according to what I see here in the forum, many are allowed quite a few whitetail tags. In most western states there are not nearly as many tags available.

In CO we are allowed one deer tag per year period. One can get two when there are extra tags available in certain areas but still limited. Most hunters in CO will only hold one tag per year for deer.
 
Good Morning Bob,

It is not my intention to engage in or fuel a heated raging "Last man standing" debate on this subject of maximum powder charges for 50 caliber PRB muzzle loading rifles.

With that said, I must still respectfully disagree with your all inclusive blanket statement,

"Anything over 80 grains is wasted on a 50 unless you like seeing a fireball at the muzzle."

If you had instead stated that in your deer hunting experience with a 50 caliber PRB ML hunting rifle, a powder charge over 80 grains is wasted, then I would not be in diagreement with you.

Before I quit hunting 10 years ago, my 50 caliber hunting load in a 33" barrel was/is 85 grains of Goex 2FF black powder, unless it is a damp, rainy day. Under those conditions, the powder charge was/is 75 grains of 3FFF. I know that a 50 caliber 80 grain load of 2FF is quite adequate for dispatching deer size animals.

However, not all muzzle loading rifle shooting is in the field for game. The other side of the shooting coin is the target game, and even this side has two parts: the buckskinners and the dedicated paper punchers.

I camp with the latter group.

For the past 30 - 40 years numerous loads have been personally chronographed in scores of rifles. During these years, my chronograph was taken to and set up at ML shooting events where for $1.00, the shooters could shoot 5 shots over the screens.

Calibers ranged from 28 to 69 with barrrel lengths from 26 inches to 46 inches. The rifles were factory models to custom made heavy barrel bench rest types.

With of all of this information, one would think that hard conclusive data could be found. NOT SO!. Too many variables! Only certain generalities could be concluded.

A particular point of interest was chronogaphing a rifle that was set up to shoot as either cap lock or flint lock.

In all instances, when using the identical load of powder, patch, and ball, the muzzle velocity was always significantly less with the flint action. In this one instance, with calibers of 50 and larger, the average muzzle velocity difference was 163 fps. In calibers of 45 and smaller, the average muzzle velocity difference was 105 fps.

In regards to what is a maximum powder charge in relation to velocity increase in calibers 50 to 58, powder charges of 80, 90, 100, 110, and 120 showed significant velocity gains in barrel lengths of 34 inches and longer. Barrels shorter than 32 inches showed lesser gains.

The chronograph and targets were aligned in a manner so that targets could be simultaneous impacted at 25, 50, and 100 yards. With this arrangement, not only was velocity determined, but trajectory and bullet impact could be measured. It was also possible to observe the effect of wind on the PRB at the different ranges.

One thing in particular did stand out. Light loads that were wonderfully accurate at 25 yards did not shoot correspondenly well at 50 yards and were down right dismal at 100 yards.

The general consensus was that as the target range increased and velocity fell off even more, the longer the various elements had time to affect the ball. There was not only more horizontal dispersment, but also more vertical displacement.

As the powder charge was increased, the groups tightened back up. In the light, hunting type rifles, most of the 50 caliber shooters use a 50-55 grain charge at 25 yards, but increase the charge to 65-75 grains at 50 yards. Charges at 100 yards run from 75 to 110 grains.

Now the gentlemen that shoot the heavy barrel, unlimited class bench rest rifles are in an entirly different class unto themselves. Try to tell them that 80 grains of 2FF powder is all that they need in their 50 caliber rifles. That kind of comment will be politely ignored while they get back to shooting 10,s and x's with powder charges that start at 100 grains in barrels with 1-72 inch rate of rifling.

Fifty caliber is nearly the offical caliber for the cross sticks shooters. In this game, there is an old saying, "It takes X's to win at 50 yards, and 10's to win at 100 yards". The X ring at 50 yards is 7/8's inch in diameter, while the 10 ring at 100 yards is 2".

Most of these shooters use 85 t0 100 grains of 2FF black powder in 12-14 pound rifles.

By the way Paul, I did not state the size of the groups that my rifles will shot, but they are smaller than what was stated in one of the post.

Deer in Texas are not any more difficult to kill than deer in any other state, the the terrain of the county across Texas varies greatly. In the forrested East Texas area, 25-50 yard shots are the norm. As you move West from there, the shooting range becomes more distant, where shots are taken at 100 plus yards.

Anybody who knows anything about the PRB is not going to chance a shot at a deer at 100 plus yards, but shots at 75-100 yards in many parts of Texas are not uncommon. I normally used 85 grains of 2FF black powder, but have used 90 and 95 grains. My chronograph tells me that extra powder is not being wasted.

My black powder shooting began at age 14. My mentor was the late "Judge" H.E. Resley of Fort Stockton, Texas. A number of his friends contributed to my education in loading and shooting the PRB. These were men who built and shot these rifles on a regular basis. Judge Resley hand rifled barrels. Some of these men were shooting original rifles that had been carefully taken care of and handed down through their families. They were kind enough to let a mere kid shoot these originals.

It was only in later years that I realized what a rare opportunity had been gifted to me.

As I approach my 70th birthday, I have 56 years of shooting the patched round ball behind me. This encludes the hunting field and competitive events. Even so, I am still learning about the muzzle loading rifle.

By the way Bob, Texas is different. For starters. Texas is the only state to join the Union by way of treaty, not territorial annexiation.

Best regards and good shooting,

If you are not an NRA or NMLRA Member, why not? I am carrying your load.

Liberal Ploiticians LIE!!! USA FREEDOMS DIE!!!!
 
Back
Top