- Joined
- Dec 25, 2011
- Messages
- 9,566
- Reaction score
- 4,720
Wasn't the little Colt model 49 one of their all time best sellers in the percussion era ?And getting on a horse.
Wasn't the little Colt model 49 one of their all time best sellers in the percussion era ?And getting on a horse.
I've watched a few of the police training venues at our local range and it makes me wonder about the average officers gun handling proficiency?Several years ago there was a hostage situation in my town and it ended when the police rushed the house and fired iirc 17 rounds hitting the villain with a single round but did manage to hit the 7 year old boy 5 times.
Speaks well for the top of the line training program........ NOT.
I believe round counting was a training regimen in the revolver days but not sure it is taught now days.I've watched a few of the police training venues at our local range and it makes me wonder about the average officers gun handling proficiency?
Good job ! I was a judo instructor 50 years ago while in the service. We had a club on base and competed with local dojos. My how the years fly by !My experience with LEO pistol proficiency is that the vast majority of officers literally suck at handling pistols. The few that are good are Very Good. This is probably also true for the vast majority of shooters in general. The amount of training it takes to get good and stay good with a pistol is ridiculous.
I helped a friend prepare for his qualification years ago. He asked me if I thought he would pass. We were martial arts instructors at the same academy so I didn't sugar coat it. He had zero prior experience with firearms and six weeks of training is a drop in the bucket.. I said if you pass it doesn't say much for the system. He passed.
I was a deputy for a few years and the other deputies and I were serious about our training and never missed an opportunity to test ourselves against ourselves and other departments. The front range departments were usually home to one or two excellent shooters in departments fielding hundreds of officers. Our Sheriff was generous with his training budgets and being at that time a somewhat remote rural county a deputy might stop along a county road or trailhead and spend a few minutes rolling cans in an arroyo. I used to pack my cap and ball and other guns with me for these sessions.My experience with LEO pistol proficiency is that the vast majority of officers literally suck at handling pistols. The few that are good are Very Good. This is probably also true for the vast majority of shooters in general. The amount of training it takes to get good and stay good with a pistol is ridiculous.
I helped a friend prepare for his qualification years ago. He asked me if I thought he would pass. We were martial arts instructors at the same academy so I didn't sugar coat it. He had zero prior experience with firearms and six weeks of training is a drop in the bucket.. I said if you pass it doesn't say much for the system. He passed.
The pocket and police pistols were huge sellers. Cheap for the quality, and judged by the public as entirely suited for the task they sold like hotcakes.Wasn't the little Colt model 49 one of their all time best sellers in the percussion era ?
I watched another open top review the other night by Mike Belveau and he reiterated how little value he places on end fitting of the arbor in response to some reviews of people "cacking" about it . He has made the fix and has some original Colts and reproductions fitted both ways. He says there's more going on in the accuracy department then just end fit of the arbor and he's been testing both regularly for 40 years. He stated it may make a difference between a 10 and an X but he's never been able to prove it one way or the other. That agrees with my findings as well and was satisfying to hear from a recognized authority who test shoots these guns regularly and reports on them for a living.The pocket and police pistols were huge sellers. Cheap for the quality, and judged by the public as entirely suited for the task they sold like hotcakes.
I think I remember that the Pattersons were issued to the rangers in pairs just as the Walkers were. They were purchased by the Texas Navy and put in storage when the Navy disbanded and then were issued in pairs to the Ranger to fight Comanhes and Apaches.back to the Phil Spangenberger article. that boxed set was obviously a very wealthy mans outfit. I wonder if the price point of the extra cylinder made it seem like a better deal to just buy two pistols? Certainly all the accounts I have read of scouts on the plains and the border wars in Kansas and Missouria have all been horseman with two or more revolvers to go with their rifle or carbine. I do recall an account by a Texas ranger of what an advantage the Paterson was when they fought Comanches. I cant remember if he mentioned the extra cylinders that they came with? I thought he did mention having two of them and that ten shots was ground breaking firepower at the time. I will try and look up that book again.
Not round counting per se but tactical reloads are taught.I believe round counting was a training regimen in the revolver days but not sure it is taught now days.
I watched another open top review the other night by Mike Belveau and he reiterated how little value he places on end fitting of the arbor in response to some reviews of people "cacking" about it . He has done the fix and has some original Colts and reproductions fitted both ways. He says there's more going on in the accuracy department then just end fit of the arbor and he's been testing both regularly for 40 years. He stated it may make a difference between a 10 and an X but he's never been able to prove it one way or the other. That agrees with my findings as well and was satisfying to hear from a recognized authority who test shoots these guns regularly and reports on them for a living.
Yeah, I'm fixing mine as well bit by bit after reading your post of how Colt actually fit them as it can't hurt and one wants to make them as good as possible. I think the better wedges have all but accomplished the same goal but it can't hurt and is easy enough to do.Not round counting per se but tactical reloads are taught.
Oh Lord…
In one sense I agree with him there. My favorite replicas purchased in the sixties and seventies were all fed a steady diet of full power loads and returned excellent accuracy for me. Minute of snowshoe rabbit, ground squirrel, coyote and grouse. Yet the designer and I assume the dozens of government inspectors felt it was important for a few well articulated reasons. I have a few 2nd Generation Colts I won’t fix, but the rest are or will be. Even the one that I began with has been “fixed”. I can’t say it’s better than before but it didn’t hurt anything and it’s running as well as ever, an old friend.
My experience with LEO pistol proficiency is that the vast majority of officers literally suck at handling pistols. The few that are good are Very Good. This is probably also true for the vast majority of shooters in general. The amount of training it takes to get good and stay good with a pistol is ridiculous.
I helped a friend prepare for his qualification years ago. He asked me if I thought he would pass. We were martial arts instructors at the same academy so I didn't sugar coat it. He had zero prior experience with firearms and six weeks of training is a drop in the bucket.. I said if you pass it doesn't say much for the system. He passed.
I think the better wedges have all but accomplished the same goal but .
Enter your email address to join: