- Joined
- Jul 17, 2019
- Messages
- 70
- Reaction score
- 259
Personally, I have no issue with Pyrodex or its use. Like Dave above, I respect it for essentially saving the sport at one time. I should also mention that its creator lost his life developing it. I’ve burned pounds of the stuff & even more real black. I can find no difference in corrosiveness or ease/difficulty in cleaning. I get no more shots between barrel swabbing. I find it requires the same prompt cleaning as real black. Its primary advantage seems to be less storing/shipping regulations, though I do get a bit more velocity too. However, I do find it harder to ignite (no surprise, really). As such, I stopped using it in Sidelock guns (yes, it will work in a percussion gun but not with the same reliability as real black, though the difference isn’t great). As a BP substitute it is absolutely inferior to Blackhorn 209 (NOT “buckhorn” 209), but in all fairness BH209 is easily superior to literally every other BP substitute too. Nowadays if a rifle will handle BH209, I use it. If it won’t, I use real black. So basically I use real black in all my traditional guns. In my inlines I use BH209 with the exception of some earlier models with plunger ignition, in those I just use real black too. I still keep some Pyrodex around but I rarely use it. All this being said, I don’t look down on its use because it can be damn convenient due to simply being available & works in a percussion gun if care is taken in its use. Sorry for the long post.
https://www.namlhunt.com/ml-lookingback2.html
https://www.namlhunt.com/ml-lookingback2.html